From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:33415) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dAHDw-0002N6-R2 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 15 May 2017 10:43:49 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dAHDt-00051z-Nk for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 15 May 2017 10:43:48 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:51542) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dAHDt-000518-H6 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 15 May 2017 10:43:45 -0400 References: <20170513022143.2838-1-n54@gmx.com> <20170515141348.GN1201@stefanha-x1.localdomain> From: Paolo Bonzini Message-ID: <296a3be1-ded2-2fd9-5ea2-86b1e786d5b7@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 15 May 2017 16:43:41 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] maintainers: Add myself as a NetBSD reviewer List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Kamil Rytarowski , Stefan Hajnoczi Cc: peter.maydell@linaro.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org On 15/05/2017 16:22, Kamil Rytarowski wrote: > On 15.05.2017 16:13, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote: >> On Sat, May 13, 2017 at 04:21:43AM +0200, Kamil Rytarowski wrote: >>> I volunteer to review NetBSD patches. >>> Adding myself will help to not miss some of them. >>> >>> Restore NetBSD as a maintained host. >>> >>> All patches to make qemu/pkgsrc building have been emitted to review. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Kamil Rytarowski >>> --- >>> MAINTAINERS | 6 ++++++ >>> configure | 1 + >>> 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+) >> >> Will you maintain a patch queue (git repo) so you can send pull >> requests? If yes, please add a T: field. >> >=20 > I don't think that there is a need for an additional patch queue, at > least in the maintained mode as a volunteer in spare time. >=20 > If there would be more BSD people, we could share a dedicated queue of > patches. How would patches be sent to the committer then? Thanks, Paolo