From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda1.sgi.com [192.48.157.11]) by oss.sgi.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/SuSE Linux 0.8) with ESMTP id o8F170IZ157545 for ; Tue, 14 Sep 2010 20:07:00 -0500 Received: from kuber.nabble.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id 51C6215E526F for ; Tue, 14 Sep 2010 18:19:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from kuber.nabble.com (kuber.nabble.com [216.139.236.158]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id AJOkAUoqDFb7sFQ6 for ; Tue, 14 Sep 2010 18:19:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from isper.nabble.com ([192.168.236.156]) by kuber.nabble.com with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1OvgTU-0007MB-4B for xfs@oss.sgi.com; Tue, 14 Sep 2010 18:07:48 -0700 Message-ID: <29714426.post@talk.nabble.com> Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2010 18:07:48 -0700 (PDT) From: pbrunnen Subject: Re: Now: Debian issues, WAS: XFS Filesystem not mounting In-Reply-To: <20100914223201.21c3bd0f@galadriel.home> MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <29704010.post@talk.nabble.com> <20100914012151.GF411@dastard> <29705139.post@talk.nabble.com> <201009140740.14482@zmi.at> <20100914082504.4109712d@galadriel.home> <29708085.post@talk.nabble.com> <201009141603.24754@zmi.at> <4C8F9E29.2000803@hardwarefreak.com> <29710491.post@talk.nabble.com> <4C8FB8D6.6080603@hardwarefreak.com> <20100914223201.21c3bd0f@galadriel.home> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: xfs@oss.sgi.com Emmanuel Florac wrote: > > I've used XFS only since 1996 and never looked back - I > still actually miss those sturdy Origin 200 and 2000 :) I've set up > about 2.5 PB of XFS filesystems in the past 5 years so I think it's > quite a significant metric. > > On the other hand I had some problems (fortunately nothing > irremediable) on reiser, ext3 though I used them only sparsely. > Obviously XFS is much more resilient to hardware glitches (I even > recovered most of the data from a RAID-0 array with a failed drive). > 2.5PB... Wow... Those are some of the best points of why to use XFS. Those are really impressive... Always was intrigued by the SGI equipment in the labs when I was at University... Never played with one though. Checked out the specs of those Origin boxes you mention. That was some horsepower for the time. -Cheers, Peter. -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/XFS-Filesystem-not-mounting-tp29704010p29714426.html Sent from the Xfs - General mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs