From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.0 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76077C433DB for ; Mon, 4 Jan 2021 21:11:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35349207B0 for ; Mon, 4 Jan 2021 21:11:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726488AbhADVLP (ORCPT ); Mon, 4 Jan 2021 16:11:15 -0500 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([63.128.21.124]:58981 "EHLO us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726148AbhADVLO (ORCPT ); Mon, 4 Jan 2021 16:11:14 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1609794587; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=Jw163ixfY01RT7kDYVefC/RgolkuqGtQaxoWbwe+jE8=; b=hZqM4ACtHwENXA1lXSV+vdzJS3H4cTq+2zU3TBC8vg1PFQvZ2oaBh5ftNQN+p1V+dyngi8 MChr5x6KklFidzT45laiD2DFGfFPSDy/ugzirfGSlFTtCTP07zprrLHl/m8iMTT8hebGxI 99Y09FzZR2c4wZ2dGK+iNmq9LnaI3GE= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-582-FjgFZH_-NgyExHCUth6J-g-1; Mon, 04 Jan 2021 16:09:45 -0500 X-MC-Unique: FjgFZH_-NgyExHCUth6J-g-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx03.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.13]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A4985C281; Mon, 4 Jan 2021 21:09:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from warthog.procyon.org.uk (ovpn-112-8.rdu2.redhat.com [10.10.112.8]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 495EF7086C; Mon, 4 Jan 2021 21:09:42 +0000 (UTC) Organization: Red Hat UK Ltd. Registered Address: Red Hat UK Ltd, Amberley Place, 107-111 Peascod Street, Windsor, Berkshire, SI4 1TE, United Kingdom. Registered in England and Wales under Company Registration No. 3798903 From: David Howells In-Reply-To: References: <365031.1608567254@warthog.procyon.org.uk> <257074.1609763562@warthog.procyon.org.uk> To: Linus Torvalds Cc: dhowells@redhat.com, Daniel Axtens , Marc Dionne , linux-afs@lists.infradead.org, linux-fsdevel , Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] afs: Work around strnlen() oops with CONFIG_FORTIFIED_SOURCE=y MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <297267.1609794581.1@warthog.procyon.org.uk> Date: Mon, 04 Jan 2021 21:09:41 +0000 Message-ID: <297268.1609794581@warthog.procyon.org.uk> X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.13 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Linus Torvalds wrote: > array (or the overflow[] one) is actually used. But I assume you've > tested this. > > Do you want me to apply the patch as-is, or will I be getting a pull > request with this (and the number-of-slots calculation thing you > mention in the commit message)? I can give you a pull req for them as a pair. I don't know if Daniel wants to comment on the first patch. David