From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Marcel Holtmann Subject: Re: [RFC 2/3] ACPI / scan: Fix enumeration for special UART devices Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2017 19:25:18 +0200 Message-ID: <2C6832A9-2BA5-42CD-A398-CD7BA5AE7C8E@holtmann.org> References: <1504786214-1866-1-git-send-email-frederic.danis.oss@gmail.com> <1504786214-1866-3-git-send-email-frederic.danis.oss@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.3 \(3273\)) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Return-path: Received: from coyote.holtmann.net ([212.227.132.17]:51894 "EHLO mail.holtmann.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751634AbdIGRZU (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Sep 2017 13:25:20 -0400 In-Reply-To: <1504786214-1866-3-git-send-email-frederic.danis.oss@gmail.com> Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org To: =?utf-8?Q?Fr=C3=A9d=C3=A9ric_Danis?= Cc: robh@kernel.org, sre@kernel.org, loic.poulain@gmail.com, linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org, linux-serial@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org Hi Fred, > UART devices is expected to be enumerated by SerDev subsystem. > Rename spi_i2c_slave to serial_slave as this is no more specific to spi or > i2c buses. > > Signed-off-by: Frédéric Danis > --- > drivers/acpi/scan.c | 29 ++++++++++++----------------- > include/acpi/acpi_bus.h | 2 +- > 2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/acpi/scan.c b/drivers/acpi/scan.c > index 70fd550..04c5ecc 100644 > --- a/drivers/acpi/scan.c > +++ b/drivers/acpi/scan.c > @@ -1429,35 +1429,30 @@ static void acpi_init_coherency(struct acpi_device *adev) > adev->flags.coherent_dma = cca; > } > > -static int acpi_check_spi_i2c_slave(struct acpi_resource *ares, void *data) > +static int acpi_check_serial_slave(struct acpi_resource *ares, void *data) > { > - bool *is_spi_i2c_slave_p = data; > + bool *is_serial_slave_p = data; > > if (ares->type != ACPI_RESOURCE_TYPE_SERIAL_BUS) > return 1; > > - /* > - * devices that are connected to UART still need to be enumerated to > - * platform bus > - */ > - if (ares->data.common_serial_bus.type != ACPI_RESOURCE_SERIAL_TYPE_UART) > - *is_spi_i2c_slave_p = true; > + *is_serial_slave_p = true; > > /* no need to do more checking */ > return -1; > } > isn’t this disabled the I2C support? I mean serial bus doesn’t always mean UART. There are other serial buses and even USB is actually a serial bus. > -static bool acpi_is_spi_i2c_slave(struct acpi_device *device) > +static bool acpi_is_serial_slave(struct acpi_device *device) > { > struct list_head resource_list; > - bool is_spi_i2c_slave = false; > + bool is_serial_slave = false; > > INIT_LIST_HEAD(&resource_list); > - acpi_dev_get_resources(device, &resource_list, acpi_check_spi_i2c_slave, > - &is_spi_i2c_slave); > + acpi_dev_get_resources(device, &resource_list, acpi_check_serial_slave, > + &is_serial_slave); > acpi_dev_free_resource_list(&resource_list); > > - return is_spi_i2c_slave; > + return is_serial_slave; > } > > void acpi_init_device_object(struct acpi_device *device, acpi_handle handle, > @@ -1476,7 +1471,7 @@ void acpi_init_device_object(struct acpi_device *device, acpi_handle handle, > acpi_bus_get_flags(device); > device->flags.match_driver = false; > device->flags.initialized = true; > - device->flags.spi_i2c_slave = acpi_is_spi_i2c_slave(device); > + device->flags.serial_slave = acpi_is_serial_slave(device); > acpi_device_clear_enumerated(device); > device_initialize(&device->dev); > dev_set_uevent_suppress(&device->dev, true); > @@ -1763,7 +1758,7 @@ static void acpi_default_enumeration(struct acpi_device *device) > * Do not enumerate SPI/I2C slaves as they will be enumerated by their > * respective parents. > */ > - if (!device->flags.spi_i2c_slave) { > + if (!device->flags.serial_slave) { > acpi_create_platform_device(device, NULL); > acpi_device_set_enumerated(device); > } else { > @@ -1860,7 +1855,7 @@ static void acpi_bus_attach(struct acpi_device *device) > return; > > device->flags.match_driver = true; > - if (ret > 0 && !device->flags.spi_i2c_slave) { > + if (ret > 0 && !device->flags.serial_slave) { > acpi_device_set_enumerated(device); > goto ok; > } > @@ -1869,7 +1864,7 @@ static void acpi_bus_attach(struct acpi_device *device) > if (ret < 0) > return; > > - if (!device->pnp.type.platform_id && !device->flags.spi_i2c_slave) > + if (!device->pnp.type.platform_id && !device->flags.serial_slave) > acpi_device_set_enumerated(device); > else > acpi_default_enumeration(device); > diff --git a/include/acpi/acpi_bus.h b/include/acpi/acpi_bus.h > index 68bc6be..49a82f8 100644 > --- a/include/acpi/acpi_bus.h > +++ b/include/acpi/acpi_bus.h > @@ -211,7 +211,7 @@ struct acpi_device_flags { > u32 of_compatible_ok:1; > u32 coherent_dma:1; > u32 cca_seen:1; > - u32 spi_i2c_slave:1; > + u32 serial_slave:1; > u32 reserved:19; > }; I am not an ACPI expert, but wouldn’t we better have a serial_bus_slave here. And the serial_bus_slave can be either UART or I2C? Or have a pretty good commit message explaining why this is serial_slave only. Regards Marcel