From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD2B6C43217 for ; Tue, 18 Oct 2022 08:49:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231138AbiJRItD (ORCPT ); Tue, 18 Oct 2022 04:49:03 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:53282 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231168AbiJRIs6 (ORCPT ); Tue, 18 Oct 2022 04:48:58 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.133.124]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8210927DD4 for ; Tue, 18 Oct 2022 01:48:57 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1666082936; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=I71EikHKgf+Cumvg3ZhyuGvJzSPCx8y69uStaChXwig=; b=dkZJl8VMDh2Tdjy6s4WN4FR3jgw+HD1SwKsSwcby91IcDrMVgtdDpfdbEYJslBEP2O+f+N aj/rDfWYZcJw3wCHh1y/toqLfT0SDmUntOnoDR49J/nChfFbEdAYJVZ+2b5QlyBQxm8Kv2 HADv/tlOfqkcaV9TMlsuaFQ1Gu1lV+M= Received: from mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (mimecast-mx02.redhat.com [66.187.233.88]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-576-EOXjjTozOO6CtfRjlIgsIw-1; Tue, 18 Oct 2022 04:48:53 -0400 X-MC-Unique: EOXjjTozOO6CtfRjlIgsIw-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx06.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.54.6]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 97229857FAB; Tue, 18 Oct 2022 08:48:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.64.54.70] (vpn2-54-70.bne.redhat.com [10.64.54.70]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D4A1F2166B41; Tue, 18 Oct 2022 08:48:43 +0000 (UTC) Reply-To: Gavin Shan Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/6] KVM: selftests: memslot_perf_test: Consolidate memory sizes To: Oliver Upton , Sean Christopherson Cc: "Maciej S. Szmigiero" , kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, kvmarm@lists.linux.dev, kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ajones@ventanamicro.com, pbonzini@redhat.com, maz@kernel.org, shuah@kernel.org, peterx@redhat.com, ricarkol@google.com, zhenyzha@redhat.com, shan.gavin@gmail.com References: <20221014071914.227134-1-gshan@redhat.com> <20221014071914.227134-6-gshan@redhat.com> From: Gavin Shan Message-ID: <2aa1e089-7af1-24f8-e33c-b123f094f4c3@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2022 16:48:40 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.1 on 10.11.54.6 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 10/18/22 3:47 PM, Oliver Upton wrote: > On Mon, Oct 17, 2022 at 10:08:48PM +0000, Sean Christopherson wrote: >> On Mon, Oct 17, 2022, Maciej S. Szmigiero wrote: >>>> +#define MEM_EXTRA_SIZE 0x10000 >>> >>> Also, an expression like "(64 << 10)" is more readable than a "1" >>> with a tail of zeroes (it's easy to add one zero too many or be one >>> zero short). >> >> +1 to not open coding raw numbers. >> >> I think it's high time KVM selftests add #defines for the common sizes, e.g. SIZE_4KB, >> 16KB, 64K, 2MB, 1GB, etc... >> >> Alternatively (or in addition), just #define 1KB, 1MB, 1GB, and 1TB, and then do >> math off of those. > > I mean I love boilerplate as much as the next guy, but we can just use > tools/include/linux/sizes.h > Nice point, I didn't realize we already had 'tools/include/linux/sizes.h'. The suggested macros (KiB, MiB, GiB, TiB and their variants) have been added to PATCH[v2 5/6]. I think it's reasonable to use 'tools/include/linux/sizes.h' directly instead of reinventing the wheel. I will go ahead to use 'tools/include/linux/sizes.h' directly in v3 if nobody objects. I would like to receive comments on v2 before I'm going to post v3. Thanks, Gavin From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from mm01.cs.columbia.edu (mm01.cs.columbia.edu [128.59.11.253]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1037C4332F for ; Tue, 18 Oct 2022 08:49:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mm01.cs.columbia.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 476FA4B85A; Tue, 18 Oct 2022 04:49:03 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: at lists.cs.columbia.edu Authentication-Results: mm01.cs.columbia.edu (amavisd-new); dkim=softfail (fail, message has been altered) header.i=@redhat.com Received: from mm01.cs.columbia.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mm01.cs.columbia.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Al6wRXOAu1Um; Tue, 18 Oct 2022 04:49:01 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mm01.cs.columbia.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mm01.cs.columbia.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFFBF4B85B; Tue, 18 Oct 2022 04:49:01 -0400 (EDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mm01.cs.columbia.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26A5E4B85B for ; Tue, 18 Oct 2022 04:49:00 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: at lists.cs.columbia.edu Received: from mm01.cs.columbia.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mm01.cs.columbia.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DLZ-W43WKYDA for ; Tue, 18 Oct 2022 04:48:59 -0400 (EDT) Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.133.124]) by mm01.cs.columbia.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19B194B85A for ; Tue, 18 Oct 2022 04:48:59 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1666082938; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=I71EikHKgf+Cumvg3ZhyuGvJzSPCx8y69uStaChXwig=; b=A2lnRai5u1KHlyftJVm28Qb/JjIF1y7wiZlmZtARxvvVG7fCSZwtKgfdNzal3B69Db2eSG SLKtOt8lTI6FDMchT9EhNmbrkglaPs5gLyzoxIvbFGN+bts3mVgkYhO+/M1vjzISF/kTZF jmKQdjslt/UjVNpWXseBhV40V6KRF5o= Received: from mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (mimecast-mx02.redhat.com [66.187.233.88]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-576-EOXjjTozOO6CtfRjlIgsIw-1; Tue, 18 Oct 2022 04:48:53 -0400 X-MC-Unique: EOXjjTozOO6CtfRjlIgsIw-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx06.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.54.6]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 97229857FAB; Tue, 18 Oct 2022 08:48:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.64.54.70] (vpn2-54-70.bne.redhat.com [10.64.54.70]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D4A1F2166B41; Tue, 18 Oct 2022 08:48:43 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/6] KVM: selftests: memslot_perf_test: Consolidate memory sizes To: Oliver Upton , Sean Christopherson References: <20221014071914.227134-1-gshan@redhat.com> <20221014071914.227134-6-gshan@redhat.com> From: Gavin Shan Message-ID: <2aa1e089-7af1-24f8-e33c-b123f094f4c3@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2022 16:48:40 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Language: en-US X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.1 on 10.11.54.6 Cc: "Maciej S. Szmigiero" , kvm@vger.kernel.org, maz@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, zhenyzha@redhat.com, shan.gavin@gmail.com, kvmarm@lists.linux.dev, pbonzini@redhat.com, shuah@kernel.org, kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, ajones@ventanamicro.com X-BeenThere: kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: Gavin Shan List-Id: Where KVM/ARM decisions are made List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Errors-To: kvmarm-bounces@lists.cs.columbia.edu Sender: kvmarm-bounces@lists.cs.columbia.edu On 10/18/22 3:47 PM, Oliver Upton wrote: > On Mon, Oct 17, 2022 at 10:08:48PM +0000, Sean Christopherson wrote: >> On Mon, Oct 17, 2022, Maciej S. Szmigiero wrote: >>>> +#define MEM_EXTRA_SIZE 0x10000 >>> >>> Also, an expression like "(64 << 10)" is more readable than a "1" >>> with a tail of zeroes (it's easy to add one zero too many or be one >>> zero short). >> >> +1 to not open coding raw numbers. >> >> I think it's high time KVM selftests add #defines for the common sizes, e.g. SIZE_4KB, >> 16KB, 64K, 2MB, 1GB, etc... >> >> Alternatively (or in addition), just #define 1KB, 1MB, 1GB, and 1TB, and then do >> math off of those. > > I mean I love boilerplate as much as the next guy, but we can just use > tools/include/linux/sizes.h > Nice point, I didn't realize we already had 'tools/include/linux/sizes.h'. The suggested macros (KiB, MiB, GiB, TiB and their variants) have been added to PATCH[v2 5/6]. I think it's reasonable to use 'tools/include/linux/sizes.h' directly instead of reinventing the wheel. I will go ahead to use 'tools/include/linux/sizes.h' directly in v3 if nobody objects. I would like to receive comments on v2 before I'm going to post v3. Thanks, Gavin _______________________________________________ kvmarm mailing list kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm