All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michael Riesch <michael.riesch@wolfvision.net>
To: Ivan Babrou <ivan@ivan.computer>, sashal@kernel.org
Cc: alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com, davem@davemloft.net,
	joabreu@synopsys.com, kuba@kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com,
	mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	peppe.cavallaro@st.com, wens@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: stmmac: dwmac-rk: fix unbalanced pm_runtime_enable warnings
Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2021 12:06:09 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2ada6f05-fc3a-a301-a008-594f7665a514@wolfvision.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAGjnhw920kNaJ9Vkg54WR8vh2TaomuTtA3WwR3eieD4v6iEJDw@mail.gmail.com>

Hello Ivan,

On 9/14/21 3:10 AM, Ivan Babrou wrote:
> Is it possible to revert the patch from the 5.14 and 5.15 as well?
> I've tried upgrading my rockpro64 board from 5.13 to 5.15-rc1 and
> ended up bisecting the issue to this commit like the others. It would
> be nice to spare others from this exercise.

For what it is worth we believe that there is a different issue with the
dwmac-rk driver that was obscured by calling pm_runtime_get_sync()
early. Investigation in progress -- I hope that we can achieve a proper
solution before we have to revert the revert.

Best regards,
Michael

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Michael Riesch <michael.riesch@wolfvision.net>
To: Ivan Babrou <ivan@ivan.computer>, sashal@kernel.org
Cc: alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com, davem@davemloft.net,
	joabreu@synopsys.com, kuba@kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com,
	mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	peppe.cavallaro@st.com, wens@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: stmmac: dwmac-rk: fix unbalanced pm_runtime_enable warnings
Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2021 12:06:09 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2ada6f05-fc3a-a301-a008-594f7665a514@wolfvision.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAGjnhw920kNaJ9Vkg54WR8vh2TaomuTtA3WwR3eieD4v6iEJDw@mail.gmail.com>

Hello Ivan,

On 9/14/21 3:10 AM, Ivan Babrou wrote:
> Is it possible to revert the patch from the 5.14 and 5.15 as well?
> I've tried upgrading my rockpro64 board from 5.13 to 5.15-rc1 and
> ended up bisecting the issue to this commit like the others. It would
> be nice to spare others from this exercise.

For what it is worth we believe that there is a different issue with the
dwmac-rk driver that was obscured by calling pm_runtime_get_sync()
early. Investigation in progress -- I hope that we can achieve a proper
solution before we have to revert the revert.

Best regards,
Michael

_______________________________________________
Linux-rockchip mailing list
Linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-rockchip

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Michael Riesch <michael.riesch@wolfvision.net>
To: Ivan Babrou <ivan@ivan.computer>, sashal@kernel.org
Cc: alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com, davem@davemloft.net,
	joabreu@synopsys.com, kuba@kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com,
	mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	peppe.cavallaro@st.com, wens@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: stmmac: dwmac-rk: fix unbalanced pm_runtime_enable warnings
Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2021 12:06:09 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2ada6f05-fc3a-a301-a008-594f7665a514@wolfvision.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAGjnhw920kNaJ9Vkg54WR8vh2TaomuTtA3WwR3eieD4v6iEJDw@mail.gmail.com>

Hello Ivan,

On 9/14/21 3:10 AM, Ivan Babrou wrote:
> Is it possible to revert the patch from the 5.14 and 5.15 as well?
> I've tried upgrading my rockpro64 board from 5.13 to 5.15-rc1 and
> ended up bisecting the issue to this commit like the others. It would
> be nice to spare others from this exercise.

For what it is worth we believe that there is a different issue with the
dwmac-rk driver that was obscured by calling pm_runtime_get_sync()
early. Investigation in progress -- I hope that we can achieve a proper
solution before we have to revert the revert.

Best regards,
Michael

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  reply	other threads:[~2021-09-14 10:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 49+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-09-14  1:10 [PATCH] net: stmmac: dwmac-rk: fix unbalanced pm_runtime_enable warnings Ivan Babrou
2021-09-14 10:06 ` Michael Riesch [this message]
2021-09-14 10:06   ` Michael Riesch
2021-09-14 10:06   ` Michael Riesch
2021-09-14 13:39   ` Sebastian Döring
2021-09-14 13:39     ` Sebastian Döring
2021-09-14 13:39     ` Sebastian Döring
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2021-08-23 14:37 Michael Riesch
2021-08-23 14:37 ` Michael Riesch
2021-08-23 14:37 ` Michael Riesch
2021-08-23 16:44 ` Jakub Kicinski
2021-08-23 16:44   ` Jakub Kicinski
2021-08-23 16:44   ` Jakub Kicinski
2021-08-25  8:07   ` Michael Riesch
2021-08-25  8:07     ` Michael Riesch
2021-08-25  8:07     ` Michael Riesch
2021-08-25  9:50 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
2021-08-25  9:50   ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
2021-08-25  9:50   ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
2021-08-29 17:48 ` Chen-Yu Tsai
2021-08-29 17:48   ` Chen-Yu Tsai
2021-08-29 17:48   ` Chen-Yu Tsai
2021-08-30  7:57   ` Michael Riesch
2021-08-30  7:57     ` Michael Riesch
2021-08-30  7:57     ` Michael Riesch
2021-08-30 13:49     ` Punit Agrawal
2021-08-30 13:49       ` Punit Agrawal
2021-08-30 13:49       ` Punit Agrawal
2021-08-30 14:10       ` Michael Riesch
2021-08-30 14:10         ` Michael Riesch
2021-08-30 14:10         ` Michael Riesch
2021-09-17  2:22         ` Qu Wenruo
2021-09-17  2:22           ` Qu Wenruo
2021-09-17  2:22           ` Qu Wenruo
2021-09-17  7:18           ` Punit Agrawal
2021-09-17  7:18             ` Punit Agrawal
2021-09-17  7:18             ` Punit Agrawal
2021-09-17  8:02             ` Qu Wenruo
2021-09-17  8:02               ` Qu Wenruo
2021-09-17  8:02               ` Qu Wenruo
2021-09-17 15:11               ` Punit Agrawal
2021-09-17 15:11                 ` Punit Agrawal
2021-09-17 15:11                 ` Punit Agrawal
2021-08-30 16:03     ` Chen-Yu Tsai
2021-08-30 16:03       ` Chen-Yu Tsai
2021-08-30 16:03       ` Chen-Yu Tsai
2021-08-30 19:22     ` Sasha Levin
2021-08-30 19:22       ` Sasha Levin
2021-08-30 19:22       ` Sasha Levin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2ada6f05-fc3a-a301-a008-594f7665a514@wolfvision.net \
    --to=michael.riesch@wolfvision.net \
    --cc=alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=ivan@ivan.computer \
    --cc=joabreu@synopsys.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com \
    --cc=mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=peppe.cavallaro@st.com \
    --cc=sashal@kernel.org \
    --cc=wens@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.