From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Vineet.Gupta1@synopsys.com (Vineet Gupta) Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2017 14:55:26 +0300 Subject: [RFC 4/6] ARC: Initial port to glibc In-Reply-To: <3bd8b935-47c0-f190-ee6b-3d08e2f3a752@redhat.com> References: <1498550454-3560-1-git-send-email-vgupta@synopsys.com> <1498550454-3560-5-git-send-email-vgupta@synopsys.com> <3bd8b935-47c0-f190-ee6b-3d08e2f3a752@redhat.com> List-ID: Message-ID: <2b02c462-44c4-02bb-6989-b3572834432e@synopsys.com> To: linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org On 06/27/2017 02:29 PM, Florian Weimer wrote: > On 06/27/2017 10:00 AM, Vineet Gupta wrote: >> diff --git a/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/arc/shlib-versions b/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/arc/shlib-versions >> new file mode 100644 >> index 000000000000..c4d5d029812d >> --- /dev/null >> +++ b/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/arc/shlib-versions >> @@ -0,0 +1,2 @@ >> +DEFAULT GLIBC_2.21 >> +ld=ld-linux.so.2 > > Is there a reason why you set the ABI baseline to GLIBC_2.21? Why not > GLBIC_2.26? No real reason, perhaps this is the version where we started off of. I'll change this - and other places to 2.26 ! Thx, -Vineet