All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Xose Vazquez Perez <xose.vazquez@gmail.com>
To: device-mapper development <dm-devel@redhat.com>,
	Christophe Varoqui <christophe.varoqui@opensvc.com>,
	Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>,
	Benjamin Marzinski <bmarzins@redhat.com>
Subject: change path_grouping_policy / some values are very confusing
Date: Wed, 3 Aug 2016 03:15:28 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2b180855-7731-6bc6-aefc-4189035b9f7d@gmail.com> (raw)

Hi,

I need an advice, and a pair of answers:

Would a change in the default path_grouping_policy from "failover" to "multibus"
be accepted?

Are "0" / FAILBACK_UNDEF / -FAILBACK_MANUAL the same?

Are "0" / NO_PATH_RETRY_UNDEF / NO_PATH_RETRY_FAIL the same?

The man page is a bit sparse about these options.

Thank you.

                 reply	other threads:[~2016-08-03  1:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2b180855-7731-6bc6-aefc-4189035b9f7d@gmail.com \
    --to=xose.vazquez@gmail.com \
    --cc=bmarzins@redhat.com \
    --cc=christophe.varoqui@opensvc.com \
    --cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
    --cc=hare@suse.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.