On 02/12/16 17:42, Laurent Pinchart wrote:

> I can understand that (even if I'm not sure it's really an issue, and we 
> should really clean up the CRTC creation code at some point), but how about 
> adding a possible_crtcs field to the priv structure then ? I don't really like 
> having to pass it around through a bunch of functions.

It is passed to two functions, I'm not sure if that's a bunch =).

I can do as you suggest, but I don't like adding fields to structs for
things that we only need once. I think local variables and function
parameters are for that.

But I agree that the patch would be quite a bit smaller with the field,
so...

 Tomi