From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Johannes Bauer Subject: Re: Frequent ext4 oopses with 4.4.0 on Intel NUC6i3SYB Date: Tue, 4 Oct 2016 19:32:14 +0200 Message-ID: <2b7d6bd6-7d16-3c60-1b84-a172ba378402@gmx.de> References: <20161004084136.GD17515@quack2.suse.cz> <90dfe18f-9fe7-819d-c410-cdd160644ab7@gmx.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org To: Jan Kara Return-path: Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.15.15]:51293 "EHLO mout.gmx.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753737AbcJDRcX (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Oct 2016 13:32:23 -0400 In-Reply-To: <90dfe18f-9fe7-819d-c410-cdd160644ab7@gmx.de> Sender: linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 04.10.2016 18:50, Johannes Bauer wrote: > Uhh, that sounds painful. So I'm following Ted's advice and building > myself a 4.8 as we speak. Damn bad idea to build on the instable target. Lots of gcc segfaults and weird stuff, even without a kernel panic. The system appears to be instable as hell. Wonder how it can even run and how much of the root fs is already corrupted :-( Rebuilding 4.8 on a different host. Cheers, Johannes From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wm0-f71.google.com (mail-wm0-f71.google.com [74.125.82.71]) by kanga.kvack.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 984D16B0038 for ; Tue, 4 Oct 2016 13:32:20 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mail-wm0-f71.google.com with SMTP id l138so132286655wmg.3 for ; Tue, 04 Oct 2016 10:32:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net. [212.227.15.15]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id gd1si5812877wjb.55.2016.10.04.10.32.19 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 04 Oct 2016 10:32:19 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: Frequent ext4 oopses with 4.4.0 on Intel NUC6i3SYB References: <20161004084136.GD17515@quack2.suse.cz> <90dfe18f-9fe7-819d-c410-cdd160644ab7@gmx.de> From: Johannes Bauer Message-ID: <2b7d6bd6-7d16-3c60-1b84-a172ba378402@gmx.de> Date: Tue, 4 Oct 2016 19:32:14 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <90dfe18f-9fe7-819d-c410-cdd160644ab7@gmx.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: To: Jan Kara Cc: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org On 04.10.2016 18:50, Johannes Bauer wrote: > Uhh, that sounds painful. So I'm following Ted's advice and building > myself a 4.8 as we speak. Damn bad idea to build on the instable target. Lots of gcc segfaults and weird stuff, even without a kernel panic. The system appears to be instable as hell. Wonder how it can even run and how much of the root fs is already corrupted :-( Rebuilding 4.8 on a different host. Cheers, Johannes -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org