From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jacek Anaszewski Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] dt-bindings: ti-lmu: Modify dt bindings for the LM3697 Date: Thu, 4 Apr 2019 21:31:56 +0200 Message-ID: <2b80bc24-54dd-16d9-a024-d2340aec6547@gmail.com> References: <20190325142403.30447-1-dmurphy@ti.com> <20190325142403.30447-4-dmurphy@ti.com> <4e38128a-fa8f-aa94-284f-2c5a4906e17d@gmail.com> <83e31761-714d-db83-8c35-cf45243cb50b@ti.com> <4983e0b6-ae2b-9d15-0408-fdb23869711a@gmail.com> <28007702-cee0-079b-ccda-864f98a7b520@ti.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <28007702-cee0-079b-ccda-864f98a7b520@ti.com> Content-Language: en-US Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Dan Murphy , robh+dt@kernel.org, pavel@ucw.cz Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-leds@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-leds@vger.kernel.org On 4/4/19 9:27 PM, Dan Murphy wrote: [...] > Maybe I should rename this to ti,brightness-resolution with the same values. > or ti,brightness-res for short hand. > > Or I could try to figure out the max-microamp but it really does not describe the hardware or > the configuration. ti,brightness-resolution sounds good to me. Rob has the last word, though. -- Best regards, Jacek Anaszewski