From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from fllv0016.ext.ti.com (fllv0016.ext.ti.com [198.47.19.142]) by mx.groups.io with SMTP id smtpd.web10.2570.1607546952268107455 for ; Wed, 09 Dec 2020 12:49:12 -0800 Authentication-Results: mx.groups.io; dkim=pass header.i=@ti.com header.s=ti-com-17q1 header.b=VB8xqwDs; spf=pass (domain: ti.com, ip: 198.47.19.142, mailfrom: dmurphy@ti.com) Received: from lelv0265.itg.ti.com ([10.180.67.224]) by fllv0016.ext.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 0B9Kn9OX102318; Wed, 9 Dec 2020 14:49:09 -0600 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ti.com; s=ti-com-17Q1; t=1607546949; bh=rt8njm+DG6PPUNQ6iSu3BZdjsuHLkJOPCoahHYI/OR8=; h=Subject:To:CC:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=VB8xqwDsj60L6htuiwFtDCD+2R15jETC/4CBqg++4gQmdwuTr8jHNxRCYnrIP9b3n IJ+/NNr7IO+YIX5NSjZ72lwRoaXrphNH2V8HQL0NEElAckZv6b59igc8NbUAE3JS1Q Z1hE4X7sQ8qY70oB3vhmawfyZ8SlI8TLzKrOWGI8= Received: from DFLE115.ent.ti.com (dfle115.ent.ti.com [10.64.6.36]) by lelv0265.itg.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 0B9Kn9u8108709 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Wed, 9 Dec 2020 14:49:09 -0600 Received: from DFLE112.ent.ti.com (10.64.6.33) by DFLE115.ent.ti.com (10.64.6.36) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1979.3; Wed, 9 Dec 2020 14:49:08 -0600 Received: from lelv0327.itg.ti.com (10.180.67.183) by DFLE112.ent.ti.com (10.64.6.33) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1979.3 via Frontend Transport; Wed, 9 Dec 2020 14:49:08 -0600 Received: from [10.250.40.192] (ileax41-snat.itg.ti.com [10.172.224.153]) by lelv0327.itg.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 0B9Kn8cs066776; Wed, 9 Dec 2020 14:49:08 -0600 Subject: Re: [OE-core] [dunfell] [PATCH 2/2] lz4: upgrade 1.9.2 -> 1.9.3 To: Steve Sakoman CC: Richard Purdie , Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer , Alexander Kanavin References: <20201209192111.21817-1-dmurphy@ti.com> <20201209192111.21817-2-dmurphy@ti.com> <95a23893-b7ea-68b3-18ab-f11cd2209a19@ti.com> From: "Dan Murphy" Message-ID: <2c2f75e6-1331-6ec4-9193-ccc6b7958c12@ti.com> Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2020 14:49:08 -0600 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.10.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: X-EXCLAIMER-MD-CONFIG: e1e8a2fd-e40a-4ac6-ac9b-f7e9cc9ee180 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Language: en-US Steve On 12/9/20 2:23 PM, Steve Sakoman wrote: > On Wed, Dec 9, 2020 at 10:03 AM Dan Murphy wrote: >> Steve >> >> No it has some enhancements. > If it has enhancements then it probably isn't appropriate for LTS, we > should stick with 1.9.2 OK > >> I was not sure if we wanted to use the dev >> branch as opposed to the release branch. > Is 1.9.2 available in the release branch? If so then that seems to be > appropriate. It is only in the dev branch not in release which seems a bit weird. Dan