From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752619AbdF1PLy (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Jun 2017 11:11:54 -0400 Received: from mail-it0-f53.google.com ([209.85.214.53]:38007 "EHLO mail-it0-f53.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752483AbdF1PLf (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Jun 2017 11:11:35 -0400 Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the block tree From: Jens Axboe To: Stephen Rothwell Cc: Linux-Next Mailing List , Linux Kernel Mailing List , "Martin K. Petersen" , Michael Ellerman , Benjamin Herrenschmidt , PowerPC References: <20170628180456.30cb9242@canb.auug.org.au> <664cc88d-18a5-18c4-5bce-4d4352d15f4f@kernel.dk> <2bd17edb-4a5b-5bf8-7074-1156a5249325@kernel.dk> Message-ID: <2c4503f8-8284-2578-3622-03529cc8bffe@kernel.dk> Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2017 09:11:32 -0600 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.1.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <2bd17edb-4a5b-5bf8-7074-1156a5249325@kernel.dk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 06/28/2017 08:01 AM, Jens Axboe wrote: > On 06/28/2017 06:43 AM, Jens Axboe wrote: >> On 06/28/2017 02:04 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: >>> Hi Jens, >>> >>> After merging the block tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc >>> allnoconfig) failed like this: >>> >>> fs/fcntl.o: In function `do_fcntl': >>> fcntl.c:(.text+0x6d4): undefined reference to `__get_user_bad' >>> fcntl.c:(.text+0x730): undefined reference to `__get_user_bad' >>> >>> Probably caused by commit >>> >>> c75b1d9421f8 ("fs: add fcntl() interface for setting/getting write life time hints") >>> >>> On powerpc (at least) you cannot use get_user() to fetch anything larger >>> than "unsigned long" i.e. 32 bits on 32 bit powerpc. >>> >>> This has been discussed before (and, I think, a fix attempted). >> >> Gah, thanks for letting me know. I'll test your patch and queue it >> up to fix this issue. > > But put_user() is fine? Just checking here, since the change adds > both a u64 put and get user. I just changed all 4, at least that provides some symmetry in how we copy things in and out for that set of fcntls. -- Jens Axboe