From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.7 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECBEAC433E6 for ; Fri, 8 Jan 2021 14:07:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC50C23772 for ; Fri, 8 Jan 2021 14:07:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727235AbhAHOHi (ORCPT ); Fri, 8 Jan 2021 09:07:38 -0500 Received: from fllv0016.ext.ti.com ([198.47.19.142]:36238 "EHLO fllv0016.ext.ti.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725793AbhAHOHh (ORCPT ); Fri, 8 Jan 2021 09:07:37 -0500 Received: from fllv0035.itg.ti.com ([10.64.41.0]) by fllv0016.ext.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 108E5o22091577; Fri, 8 Jan 2021 08:05:50 -0600 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ti.com; s=ti-com-17Q1; t=1610114750; bh=7QUxdJubf6npHB6XXysEgpQV+ARRLTU9YbZ45EDawGs=; h=Subject:To:CC:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=Wx+e8zAn/GaP9GFC8ofyKGFEDS1CiHHIFKyNMQmTjWyh7OD73Vmc2BVwqK/Z3iX78 otxF3oxkoc7ZZI3Lz4+WomzE6vCpwyi5TOXkaIGU9VPRICE2JZv6Ci2rjvyOVBvqdN 9+y3tHs3yLZWJP3jtdiRlCWMm1473CaLeTTyPzzc= Received: from DFLE102.ent.ti.com (dfle102.ent.ti.com [10.64.6.23]) by fllv0035.itg.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 108E5oh1058228 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Fri, 8 Jan 2021 08:05:50 -0600 Received: from DFLE111.ent.ti.com (10.64.6.32) by DFLE102.ent.ti.com (10.64.6.23) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1979.3; Fri, 8 Jan 2021 08:05:50 -0600 Received: from fllv0039.itg.ti.com (10.64.41.19) by DFLE111.ent.ti.com (10.64.6.32) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1979.3 via Frontend Transport; Fri, 8 Jan 2021 08:05:50 -0600 Received: from [10.24.69.20] (ileax41-snat.itg.ti.com [10.172.224.153]) by fllv0039.itg.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 108E5lEi108720; Fri, 8 Jan 2021 08:05:48 -0600 Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] arm64: dts: ti: k3: squelch warnings regarding no #address-cells for interrupt-controller To: Nishanth Menon , Sekhar Nori , Device Tree Mailing List , Rob Herring CC: Grygorii Strashko , Linux ARM Mailing List , , Faiz Abbas , Andre Przywara References: <20201117161942.38754-1-nsekhar@ti.com> <20201117161942.38754-3-nsekhar@ti.com> <20201118151259.kpag44djji4ssiup@eldest> <18e41dba-a3dd-308a-605e-63b76ca638e5@ti.com> <20201119132829.sr435jf6s4275q4i@boxlike> <313a9cd5-7411-4ae1-cde4-42a2c18d11e6@ti.com> <20201124012100.fq7w7bjxvewuhbt2@shirt> <8885dd79-061b-82e3-1aeb-a318f7d8256d@ti.com> <20201127142340.ei7o4zkg5trwcspy@chevron> From: Lokesh Vutla Message-ID: <2c6df02e-e7a8-fa48-27bc-140bfa500360@ti.com> Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2021 19:35:46 +0530 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20201127142340.ei7o4zkg5trwcspy@chevron> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-EXCLAIMER-MD-CONFIG: e1e8a2fd-e40a-4ac6-ac9b-f7e9cc9ee180 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Rob, Grygorii, On 27/11/20 7:53 pm, Nishanth Menon wrote: > On 09:46-20201124, Sekhar Nori wrote: >> On 24/11/20 6:51 AM, Nishanth Menon wrote: >>> On 09:45-20201123, Sekhar Nori wrote: >>>>>> The main reason I commented - is hope to get some clarification from DT maintainers. >>>>>> 90% of interrupt-controller nodes do not have #address-cells and I never seen in in GPIO nodes >>>>>> (most often is present in PCI and GIC nodes). >>>>>> and nobody seems fixing it. So, if we are going to move this direction it's reasonable to get clarification to be sure. >>>>>> >>>>>> And there is no "never" here - #address-cells always can be added if really required. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> OK - as a GPIO node, but as an interrupt-controller node, I was >>>>> looking at [1] and wondering if that was the precedence. >>>>> >>>>> Yes, will be good to get direction from the DT maintainers on this >>>>> topic. >>>> Is there a conclusion on this topic? Without adding address-cells for interrupt controller we will be introducing new warning for all the new nodes we are adding. Thanks and regards, Lokesh From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.7 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, NICE_REPLY_A,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA786C433DB for ; Fri, 8 Jan 2021 14:08:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from merlin.infradead.org (merlin.infradead.org [205.233.59.134]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3DD2D22A99 for ; Fri, 8 Jan 2021 14:08:37 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 3DD2D22A99 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=ti.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=merlin.20170209; h=Sender:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post:List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:From: References:To:Subject:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=m9tAhrdLSv3n1mnyzDvuyoJLUMMU6HyRB1k+RG6/5EE=; b=U5ZcYCzbuhmzPrGwls2o9icPx fMNjokV4lQk6jUbSOytGh3zX0vWe7DqdsRNqH7WMeF+MVqow7zm2eTxbhIxrO3V29mjBowy6vMB0p 9ZnEomD1dLdxh5mlQBCJrmpyYYmp4uU2+ubV3hPKY7LDrMPBlbJh3Q0lfFC2CgXMeUB0uDq7L3rn4 x/mCxW/6bqv4zmxdHoIgiuEwYegkNt5wyb6TxoJMDuK2cuDy9OiUyek1PnHISl0VAHwzo8iKKNsAx ceAIDLtbIvin6f2jb20RoXeBBFwsUPJqwfUsaKd+UFHBkxhuYK8mWVtCKYrGRFieTyAe8tCtAQ/NN qz3HjcKVA==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=merlin.infradead.org) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1kxsPI-000635-Ti; Fri, 08 Jan 2021 14:06:24 +0000 Received: from fllv0016.ext.ti.com ([198.47.19.142]) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1kxsOu-00062b-Gm for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Fri, 08 Jan 2021 14:06:01 +0000 Received: from fllv0035.itg.ti.com ([10.64.41.0]) by fllv0016.ext.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 108E5o22091577; Fri, 8 Jan 2021 08:05:50 -0600 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ti.com; s=ti-com-17Q1; t=1610114750; bh=7QUxdJubf6npHB6XXysEgpQV+ARRLTU9YbZ45EDawGs=; h=Subject:To:CC:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=Wx+e8zAn/GaP9GFC8ofyKGFEDS1CiHHIFKyNMQmTjWyh7OD73Vmc2BVwqK/Z3iX78 otxF3oxkoc7ZZI3Lz4+WomzE6vCpwyi5TOXkaIGU9VPRICE2JZv6Ci2rjvyOVBvqdN 9+y3tHs3yLZWJP3jtdiRlCWMm1473CaLeTTyPzzc= Received: from DFLE102.ent.ti.com (dfle102.ent.ti.com [10.64.6.23]) by fllv0035.itg.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 108E5oh1058228 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Fri, 8 Jan 2021 08:05:50 -0600 Received: from DFLE111.ent.ti.com (10.64.6.32) by DFLE102.ent.ti.com (10.64.6.23) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1979.3; Fri, 8 Jan 2021 08:05:50 -0600 Received: from fllv0039.itg.ti.com (10.64.41.19) by DFLE111.ent.ti.com (10.64.6.32) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1979.3 via Frontend Transport; Fri, 8 Jan 2021 08:05:50 -0600 Received: from [10.24.69.20] (ileax41-snat.itg.ti.com [10.172.224.153]) by fllv0039.itg.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 108E5lEi108720; Fri, 8 Jan 2021 08:05:48 -0600 Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] arm64: dts: ti: k3: squelch warnings regarding no #address-cells for interrupt-controller To: Nishanth Menon , Sekhar Nori , Device Tree Mailing List , Rob Herring References: <20201117161942.38754-1-nsekhar@ti.com> <20201117161942.38754-3-nsekhar@ti.com> <20201118151259.kpag44djji4ssiup@eldest> <18e41dba-a3dd-308a-605e-63b76ca638e5@ti.com> <20201119132829.sr435jf6s4275q4i@boxlike> <313a9cd5-7411-4ae1-cde4-42a2c18d11e6@ti.com> <20201124012100.fq7w7bjxvewuhbt2@shirt> <8885dd79-061b-82e3-1aeb-a318f7d8256d@ti.com> <20201127142340.ei7o4zkg5trwcspy@chevron> From: Lokesh Vutla Message-ID: <2c6df02e-e7a8-fa48-27bc-140bfa500360@ti.com> Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2021 19:35:46 +0530 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20201127142340.ei7o4zkg5trwcspy@chevron> Content-Language: en-US X-EXCLAIMER-MD-CONFIG: e1e8a2fd-e40a-4ac6-ac9b-f7e9cc9ee180 X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20210108_090600_714360_8F8032B7 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 13.37 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Andre Przywara , Grygorii Strashko , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Linux ARM Mailing List , Faiz Abbas Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org Hi Rob, Grygorii, On 27/11/20 7:53 pm, Nishanth Menon wrote: > On 09:46-20201124, Sekhar Nori wrote: >> On 24/11/20 6:51 AM, Nishanth Menon wrote: >>> On 09:45-20201123, Sekhar Nori wrote: >>>>>> The main reason I commented - is hope to get some clarification from DT maintainers. >>>>>> 90% of interrupt-controller nodes do not have #address-cells and I never seen in in GPIO nodes >>>>>> (most often is present in PCI and GIC nodes). >>>>>> and nobody seems fixing it. So, if we are going to move this direction it's reasonable to get clarification to be sure. >>>>>> >>>>>> And there is no "never" here - #address-cells always can be added if really required. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> OK - as a GPIO node, but as an interrupt-controller node, I was >>>>> looking at [1] and wondering if that was the precedence. >>>>> >>>>> Yes, will be good to get direction from the DT maintainers on this >>>>> topic. >>>> Is there a conclusion on this topic? Without adding address-cells for interrupt controller we will be introducing new warning for all the new nodes we are adding. Thanks and regards, Lokesh _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel