From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-12.3 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF981C433DB for ; Fri, 15 Jan 2021 15:44:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.xenproject.org (lists.xenproject.org [192.237.175.120]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 78D8623122 for ; Fri, 15 Jan 2021 15:44:41 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 78D8623122 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=xen.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=xen-devel-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Received: from list by lists.xenproject.org with outflank-mailman.68379.122427 (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1l0RH1-0004uq-8I; Fri, 15 Jan 2021 15:44:27 +0000 X-Outflank-Mailman: Message body and most headers restored to incoming version Received: by outflank-mailman (output) from mailman id 68379.122427; Fri, 15 Jan 2021 15:44:27 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.xenproject.org) by lists.xenproject.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1l0RH1-0004uj-4y; Fri, 15 Jan 2021 15:44:27 +0000 Received: by outflank-mailman (input) for mailman id 68379; Fri, 15 Jan 2021 15:44:25 +0000 Received: from mail.xenproject.org ([104.130.215.37]) by lists.xenproject.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1l0RGz-0004ue-DG for xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Fri, 15 Jan 2021 15:44:25 +0000 Received: from xenbits.xenproject.org ([104.239.192.120]) by mail.xenproject.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1l0RGu-0006rS-79; Fri, 15 Jan 2021 15:44:20 +0000 Received: from [54.239.6.188] (helo=a483e7b01a66.ant.amazon.com) by xenbits.xenproject.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1l0RGt-00044q-QV; Fri, 15 Jan 2021 15:44:19 +0000 X-BeenThere: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org List-Id: Xen developer discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xenproject.org Precedence: list Sender: "Xen-devel" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=xen.org; s=20200302mail; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To: MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:From:References:Cc:To:Subject; bh=YRApYOWZzI3Lw9Jxg1Ab3l3nzS3b+aKClZbss6nety4=; b=wLvpyocGRJ1mEJLS1vBM/sonvt zQ6v5pGPc2c9DaD0DJya09TtDxel92N4oO555LWRsCNuJYbSxHURgtrLbp1Zppy7XZqj9cUq75JDd hhlPrChUJZisQ4GTe8xygTEpMvoYEY/URLmysQDfqOx02w2ParNBVh8uhPVu3s0PMCR8=; Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 08/24] xen/ioreq: Move x86's ioreq_server to struct domain To: Oleksandr Tyshchenko , xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org Cc: Oleksandr Tyshchenko , Paul Durrant , Andrew Cooper , George Dunlap , Ian Jackson , Jan Beulich , Stefano Stabellini , Wei Liu , =?UTF-8?Q?Roger_Pau_Monn=c3=a9?= , Julien Grall References: <1610488352-18494-1-git-send-email-olekstysh@gmail.com> <1610488352-18494-9-git-send-email-olekstysh@gmail.com> From: Julien Grall Message-ID: <2d2401ba-72f3-c37c-3eda-ea7e7164855c@xen.org> Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2021 15:44:17 +0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.6.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1610488352-18494-9-git-send-email-olekstysh@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-GB Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi Oleksandr, On 12/01/2021 21:52, Oleksandr Tyshchenko wrote: > From: Oleksandr Tyshchenko > > The IOREQ is a common feature now and this struct will be used > on Arm as is. Move it to common struct domain. This also > significantly reduces the layering violation in the common code > (*arch.hvm* usage). > > We don't move ioreq_gfn since it is not used in the common code > (the "legacy" mechanism is x86 specific). > > Signed-off-by: Oleksandr Tyshchenko > Acked-by: Jan Beulich > CC: Julien Grall > [On Arm only] > Tested-by: Wei Chen Reviewed-by: Julien Grall Cheers, -- Julien Grall