From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (gabe.freedesktop.org [131.252.210.177]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 694D1C6FA8B for ; Thu, 22 Sep 2022 08:39:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C203910E3D3; Thu, 22 Sep 2022 08:39:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mga07.intel.com (mga07.intel.com [134.134.136.100]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D381C10E3D3 for ; Thu, 22 Sep 2022 08:39:29 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1663835969; x=1695371969; h=message-id:date:mime-version:subject:to:cc:references: from:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Y0A3vUUPiE5/k/r3jvTNOz3+vKE3RQEkKOD2o7ZC1X8=; b=LAztIfqhP0b6VQHGP8q99fot5SsvBtfXDNcylQrZvk0vwrNiaUlxfs1L lrkmjwtHsoJy7Oq8X8zJHMEOIkG61kmfy8WNnlewNGdR3GXgqCTGDeSj0 iMf4ehUrCGDlcBOO9Y0lIvsJMZqkUWPj8Yf2BXO1AUVr534J/7/9vvebw jWISCyslW2Rha9morUPFiLnj9oFQmdMfziOGo8x30FEFii1UJ30E8y/0q QU2PQa30szcXHdmXGbNSCweHovRH0M1qg2rPxlYU4whWhoW89nYalkFHc PqSNHVhk+XXAdz3j4h31E/6Tc+X7xOfoc9/hoGhZ7AcuAM0hn2+NtqoJc w==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6500,9779,10477"; a="364219714" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.93,335,1654585200"; d="scan'208";a="364219714" Received: from fmsmga005.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.32]) by orsmga105.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 22 Sep 2022 01:39:29 -0700 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.93,335,1654585200"; d="scan'208";a="948507976" Received: from nirmoyda-mobl.ger.corp.intel.com (HELO [10.252.2.242]) ([10.252.2.242]) by fmsmga005-auth.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 22 Sep 2022 01:39:28 -0700 Message-ID: <2d8c9658-5b0a-ef3f-1c94-d3273f6f7a0a@linux.intel.com> Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2022 10:39:25 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.2.2 Content-Language: en-US To: =?UTF-8?B?VmlsbGUgU3lyasOkbMOk?= References: <20220906174609.23494-1-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> <6e71f8d2-fd50-4550-5168-240c6f703c7f@linux.intel.com> <7280ab53-dfed-4b37-2bfc-b731010c5cd2@linux.intel.com> From: "Das, Nirmoy" In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Kick rcu harder to free objects X-BeenThere: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Intel graphics driver community testing & development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org Errors-To: intel-gfx-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Sender: "Intel-gfx" On 9/21/2022 9:56 AM, Ville Syrjälä wrote: > On Fri, Sep 09, 2022 at 10:29:55AM +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote: >> On Thu, Sep 08, 2022 at 09:34:04PM +0200, Das, Nirmoy wrote: >>> On 9/8/2022 5:11 PM, Ville Syrjälä wrote: >>>> On Thu, Sep 08, 2022 at 04:32:56PM +0200, Das, Nirmoy wrote: >>>>> Hi Ville, >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> I fixed a similar issue in DII but I couldn't reproduce it in drm >>>>> >>>>> http://intel-gfx-pw.fi.intel.com/patch/228850/?series=15910&rev=2. >>>>> >>>>> I wonder if that fixes the problem you are facing then I can send that >>>>> to drm. >>>> CI can tell you. It has been complaining about this for ages >>> >>> Could you please share a url/failed test name. I must be searching the >>> wrong hw/test(https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/fi-ivb-3770.html). >> https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/CI_DRM_12102/fi-pnv-d510/igt@i915_selftest@live@requests.html >> >> gen3 hits it nearly 100% of the time in the live selftests. >> IIRC it also looked like shard-snb has also hit it more >> sporadically in some tests. >> >> There's also at least one bug about it >> https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/issues/4528 >> which I guess is why ci is able to ignore this, and that >> then has enabled all the humans to ignore it as well. > Did we get anywhere with this? I'm getting tired of > seeing the red in CI. Please review https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/501991/?series=108314&rev=1 Sorry, I should've Cced you. It seems to fix the issue: https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/Patchwork_108314v1/fi-pnv-d510/igt@i915_selftest@live@requests.html Regards, Nirmoy >