All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
To: Shyam Sundar S K <Shyam-sundar.S-k@amd.com>, markgross@kernel.org
Cc: platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org, Patil.Reddy@amd.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 03/15] platform/x86/amd/pmf: Add support for PMF APCI layer
Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2022 15:57:39 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2dc85390-3a45-dec1-934d-09b3f09fa434@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220712145847.3438544-4-Shyam-sundar.S-k@amd.com>

Hi,

On 7/12/22 16:58, Shyam Sundar S K wrote:
> PMF driver implements the ACPI methods as defined by AMD for PMF Support.
> The ACPI layer acts as a glue that helps in providing the infrastructure
> for OEMs customization.
> 
> OEMs can refer to PMF support documentation to decide on the list of
> functions to be supported on their specific platform model.
> 
> AMD mandates that PMF ACPI fn0 and fn1 to be implemented which
> provides the set of functions, params and the notifications that
> would be sent to PMF driver so that PMF driver can adapt and
> react.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Shyam Sundar S K <Shyam-sundar.S-k@amd.com>
> ---
>  drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/Makefile |   2 +-
>  drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/acpi.c   | 188 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/core.c   |   1 +
>  drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/pmf.h    |  32 +++++
>  4 files changed, 222 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>  create mode 100644 drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/acpi.c
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/Makefile b/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/Makefile
> index 459005f659e5..2617eba773ce 100644
> --- a/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/Makefile
> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/Makefile
> @@ -5,4 +5,4 @@
>  #
>  
>  obj-$(CONFIG_AMD_PMF) += amd-pmf.o
> -amd-pmf-objs := core.o
> +amd-pmf-objs := core.o acpi.o
> diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/acpi.c b/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/acpi.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..addcaae5675c
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/acpi.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,188 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +/*
> + * AMD Platform Management Framework Driver
> + *
> + * Copyright (c) 2022, Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
> + * All Rights Reserved.
> + *
> + * Author: Shyam Sundar S K <Shyam-sundar.S-k@amd.com>
> + */
> +
> +#include <linux/acpi.h>
> +#include "pmf.h"
> +
> +#define APMF_METHOD "\\_SB_.PMF_.APMF"
> +
> +static unsigned long supported_func;
> +
> +static void apmf_if_parse_functions(struct apmf_if_functions *func, u32 mask);
> +
> +static union acpi_object *apmf_if_call(struct apmf_if *apmf_if, int func, struct acpi_buffer *param)
> +{
> +	struct acpi_buffer buffer = { ACPI_ALLOCATE_BUFFER, NULL };
> +	struct acpi_object_list apmf_if_arg_list;
> +	union acpi_object apmf_if_args[2];
> +	acpi_status status;
> +
> +	apmf_if_arg_list.count = 2;
> +	apmf_if_arg_list.pointer = &apmf_if_args[0];
> +
> +	apmf_if_args[0].type = ACPI_TYPE_INTEGER;
> +	apmf_if_args[0].integer.value = func;
> +
> +	if (param) {
> +		apmf_if_args[1].type = ACPI_TYPE_BUFFER;
> +		apmf_if_args[1].buffer.length = param->length;
> +		apmf_if_args[1].buffer.pointer = param->pointer;
> +	} else {
> +		apmf_if_args[1].type = ACPI_TYPE_INTEGER;
> +		apmf_if_args[1].integer.value = 0;
> +	}
> +
> +	status = acpi_evaluate_object(apmf_if->handle, NULL, &apmf_if_arg_list, &buffer);
> +	if (ACPI_FAILURE(status)) {
> +		pr_err("PMF: APMF method call failed\n");
> +		if (status != AE_NOT_FOUND)
> +			kfree(buffer.pointer);
> +
> +		return NULL;
> +	}
> +
> +	return buffer.pointer;
> +}
> +
> +static void apmf_if_parse_functions(struct apmf_if_functions *func, u32 mask)
> +{
> +	func->system_params = mask & APMF_FUNC_GET_SYS_PARAMS;
> +}
> +
> +static int apmf_if_verify_interface(struct amd_pmf_dev *pdev, struct apmf_if *ampf_if)
> +{
> +	struct apmf_verify_interface output;
> +	union acpi_object *info;
> +	size_t size;
> +	int err = 0;
> +
> +	info = apmf_if_call(ampf_if, APMF_FUNC_VERIFY_INTERFACE, NULL);
> +	if (!info)
> +		return -EIO;
> +

You are missing the following checks here:

	if (info->type != ACPI_TYPE_BUFFER) {
		dev_err(pdev->dev, "object is not a buffer\n");
		err = -EINVAL;
		goto out;
	}

	if (info->buffer.length < 2) }
		dev_err(pdev->dev, "buffer too small\n");
		err = -EINVAL;
		goto out;
	}

> +	size = *(u16 *)info->buffer.pointer;

And here you are missing:

	if (info->buffer.length < size) {
		dev_err(pdev->dev, "buffer smaller then headersize %zu < %zu\n",
			info->buffer.length, size);
		err = -EINVAL;
		goto out;
	}

> +
> +	if (size < sizeof(output)) {
> +		dev_err(pdev->dev, "buffer too small %zu\n", size);
> +		err = -EINVAL;
> +		goto out;
> +	}
> +
> +	size = min(sizeof(output), size);

You already know that size >= sizeof(output) because of the above if
so this boils down to:

	size = sizeof(output);



> +	memset(&output, 0, sizeof(output));

Since the memcpy size == sizeof(output), this memset is not necessary,
please drop it.

> +	memcpy(&output, info->buffer.pointer, size);
> +	apmf_if_parse_functions(&ampf_if->func, output.supported_functions);
> +	supported_func = output.supported_functions;
> +	dev_dbg(pdev->dev, "supported functions:0x%x notifications:0x%x\n",
> +		output.supported_functions, output.notification_mask);
> +
> +out:
> +	kfree(info);
> +	return err;
> +}
> +
> +int is_apmf_func_supported(unsigned long index)
> +{
> +	/* If bit-n is set, that indicates function n+1 is supported */
> +	return ((supported_func & (1 << (index - 1))) != 0);
> +}
> +
> +static int apmf_get_system_params(struct apmf_if *ampf_if)
> +{
> +	struct apmf_system_params params;
> +	union acpi_object *info;
> +	size_t size;
> +	int err = 0;
> +
> +	info = apmf_if_call(ampf_if, APMF_FUNC_GET_SYS_PARAMS, NULL);
> +	if (!info) {
> +		err = -EIO;
> +		goto out;
> +	}
> +
> +	size = *(u16 *)info->buffer.pointer;
> +
> +	if (size < sizeof(params)) {
> +		pr_err("PMF: buffer too small %zu\n", size);
> +		err = -EINVAL;
> +		goto out;
> +	}
> +
> +	size = min(sizeof(params), size);

All the same remarks wrt size handling as above. It would be good
to write a common helper for this, which takes a void *pointer to the
struct to fill as well as the struct size as parameters and then do
the apmf_if_call() + all the size checks + memcpy in the helper.


> +	memset(&params, 0, sizeof(params));
> +	memcpy(&params, info->buffer.pointer, size);
> +
> +	pr_debug("PMF: system params mask:0x%x flags:0x%x cmd_code:0x%x\n",
> +		 params.valid_mask,
> +		 params.flags,
> +		 params.command_code);
> +	params.flags = params.flags & params.valid_mask;
> +
> +out:
> +	kfree(info);
> +	return err;
> +}
> +
> +static acpi_handle apmf_if_probe_handle(void)
> +{
> +	acpi_handle handle = NULL;
> +	char acpi_method_name[255] = { 0 };

Please also use ACPI_FULL_PATHNAME here, like you do below
in the acpi_get_name() call.

> +	struct acpi_buffer buffer = { sizeof(acpi_method_name), acpi_method_name };

Please always use named struct initializers.

> +	acpi_status status;
> +
> +	status = acpi_get_handle(NULL, (acpi_string) APMF_METHOD, &handle);
> +	if (ACPI_SUCCESS(status))
> +		goto out;
> +
> +	pr_err("PMF: APMF handle not found\n");
> +	return NULL;
> +
> +out:
> +	acpi_get_name(handle, ACPI_FULL_PATHNAME, &buffer);

You already know the name since you just looked up the handle by its
ACPI path, so this is not useful and can be dropped.

> +	pr_debug("PMF: APMF handle %s found\n", acpi_method_name);
> +	return handle;
> +}
> +
> +int apmf_acpi_init(struct amd_pmf_dev *pmf_dev)
> +{
> +	acpi_handle apmf_if_handle;
> +	struct apmf_if *apmf_if;
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	apmf_if_handle = apmf_if_probe_handle();
> +	if (!apmf_if_handle)
> +		goto out;
> +
> +	apmf_if = kzalloc(sizeof(*apmf_if), GFP_KERNEL);
> +	if (!apmf_if)
> +		goto out;
> +
> +	apmf_if->handle = apmf_if_handle;
> +
> +	ret = apmf_if_verify_interface(pmf_dev, apmf_if);
> +	if (ret) {
> +		dev_err(pmf_dev->dev, "APMF verify interface failed :%d\n", ret);
> +		kfree(apmf_if);
> +		goto out;
> +	}
> +	pmf_dev->apmf_if = apmf_if;
> +
> +	if (apmf_if->func.system_params) {

Maybe move this if check to inside apmf_get_system_params() ?

> +		ret = apmf_get_system_params(apmf_if);
> +		if (ret) {
> +			dev_err(pmf_dev->dev, "APMF apmf_get_system_params failed :%d\n", ret);
> +			kfree(apmf_if);
> +			goto out;
> +		}
> +	}
> +
> +out:
> +	return ret;
> +}
> diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/core.c b/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/core.c
> index aef97965c181..c5002b7bb904 100644
> --- a/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/core.c
> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/core.c
> @@ -204,6 +204,7 @@ static int amd_pmf_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  	if (!dev->regbase)
>  		return -ENOMEM;
>  
> +	apmf_acpi_init(dev);
>  	platform_set_drvdata(pdev, dev);
>  
>  	mutex_init(&dev->lock);
> diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/pmf.h b/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/pmf.h
> index ab773aa5a6e1..40f038eb6197 100644
> --- a/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/pmf.h
> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/pmf.h
> @@ -10,6 +10,12 @@
>  #ifndef PMF_H
>  #define PMF_H
>  
> +#include <linux/acpi.h>
> +
> +/* APMF Functions */
> +#define APMF_FUNC_VERIFY_INTERFACE			0
> +#define APMF_FUNC_GET_SYS_PARAMS			1
> +
>  /* Message Definitions */
>  #define SET_SPL				0x03 /* SPL: Sustained Power Limit */
>  #define SET_SPPT			0x05 /* SPPT: Slow Package Power Tracking */
> @@ -29,6 +35,30 @@
>  #define GET_STT_LIMIT_APU	0x20
>  #define GET_STT_LIMIT_HS2	0x21
>  
> +/* AMD PMF BIOS interfaces */
> +struct apmf_if_functions {
> +	bool system_params;
> +};
> +
> +struct apmf_if {
> +	acpi_handle handle;
> +	struct apmf_if_functions func;
> +};
> +
> +struct apmf_verify_interface {
> +	u16 size;
> +	u16 version;
> +	u32 notification_mask;
> +	u32 supported_functions;
> +} __packed;
> +
> +struct apmf_system_params {
> +	u16 size;
> +	u32 valid_mask;
> +	u32 flags;
> +	u8 command_code;
> +} __packed;
> +
>  struct amd_pmf_dev {
>  	void __iomem *regbase;
>  	void __iomem *smu_virt_addr;
> @@ -38,10 +68,12 @@ struct amd_pmf_dev {
>  	u32 hi;
>  	u32 low;
>  	struct device *dev;
> +	struct apmf_if *apmf_if;
>  	struct mutex lock; /* protects the PMF interface */
>  };
>  
>  /* Core Layer */
> +int apmf_acpi_init(struct amd_pmf_dev *pmf_dev);
>  int amd_pmf_send_cmd(struct amd_pmf_dev *dev, u8 message, bool get, u32 arg, u32 *data);
>  
>  #endif /* PMF_H */


Regards,

Hans


  reply	other threads:[~2022-07-27 13:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 56+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-07-12 14:58 [PATCH v1 00/15] platform/x86/amd/pmf: Introduce AMD PMF Driver Shyam Sundar S K
2022-07-12 14:58 ` [PATCH v1 01/15] ACPI: platform_profile: Add support for notification chains Shyam Sundar S K
2022-07-12 15:03   ` Limonciello, Mario
2022-07-27 13:24     ` Hans de Goede
2022-07-27 20:38   ` Hans de Goede
2022-07-12 14:58 ` [PATCH v1 02/15] platform/x86/amd/pmf: Add support for PMF core layer Shyam Sundar S K
2022-07-27 13:57   ` Hans de Goede
2022-07-12 14:58 ` [PATCH v1 03/15] platform/x86/amd/pmf: Add support for PMF APCI layer Shyam Sundar S K
2022-07-27 13:57   ` Hans de Goede [this message]
2022-07-12 14:58 ` [PATCH v1 04/15] platform/x86/amd/pmf: Add support SPS PMF feature Shyam Sundar S K
2022-07-27 19:29   ` Hans de Goede
2022-07-27 20:26     ` Hans de Goede
2022-07-12 14:58 ` [PATCH v1 05/15] platform/x86/amd/pmf: Add debugfs information Shyam Sundar S K
2022-07-27 19:50   ` Hans de Goede
2022-07-12 14:58 ` [PATCH v1 06/15] platform/x86/amd/pmf: Add heartbeat signal support Shyam Sundar S K
2022-07-27 19:53   ` Hans de Goede
2022-07-12 14:58 ` [PATCH v1 07/15] platform/x86/amd/pmf: Add fan control support Shyam Sundar S K
2022-07-27 20:11   ` Hans de Goede
2022-07-12 14:58 ` [PATCH v1 08/15] platform/x86/amd/pmf: Get performance metrics from PMFW Shyam Sundar S K
2022-07-27 20:36   ` Hans de Goede
2022-07-12 14:58 ` [PATCH v1 09/15] platform/x86/amd/pmf: Add support for CnQF Shyam Sundar S K
2022-07-27 20:51   ` Hans de Goede
2022-07-27 21:00   ` Hans de Goede
2022-07-12 14:58 ` [PATCH v1 10/15] platform/x86/amd/pmf: Add sysfs to toggle CnQF Shyam Sundar S K
2022-07-27 20:52   ` Hans de Goede
2022-07-27 21:12     ` Hans de Goede
2022-07-12 14:58 ` [PATCH v1 11/15] Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-amd-pmf: Add ABI doc for AMD PMF Shyam Sundar S K
2022-07-27 20:52   ` Hans de Goede
2022-07-12 14:58 ` [PATCH v1 12/15] platform/x86/amd/pmf: Add support for Auto mode feature Shyam Sundar S K
2022-07-27 21:22   ` Hans de Goede
2022-07-28 12:57     ` Shyam Sundar S K
2022-07-28 13:15       ` Hans de Goede
2022-07-12 14:58 ` [PATCH v1 13/15] platform/x86/amd/pmf: Handle AMT and CQL events for Auto mode Shyam Sundar S K
2022-07-27 21:33   ` Hans de Goede
2022-07-27 21:44   ` Hans de Goede
2022-07-27 21:46   ` Hans de Goede
2022-07-27 23:52     ` Limonciello, Mario
2022-07-28 13:03       ` Hans de Goede
2022-07-28 13:43         ` Limonciello, Mario
2022-07-28 14:09           ` Hans de Goede
2022-07-28 14:38             ` Limonciello, Mario
2022-07-28 17:46               ` Hans de Goede
2022-07-28 18:06                 ` Limonciello, Mario
2022-07-28 18:17                   ` Hans de Goede
2022-07-28 21:01                     ` Limonciello, Mario
2022-07-29 11:03                       ` Hans de Goede
2022-07-29 15:43                         ` Limonciello, Mario
2022-07-29 17:40                           ` Shyam Sundar S K
2022-07-29 17:59                             ` Hans de Goede
2022-08-01 10:29                               ` Shyam Sundar S K
2022-08-01 11:08                                 ` Hans de Goede
2022-07-12 14:58 ` [PATCH v1 14/15] platform/x86/amd/pmf: Force load driver on older supported platforms Shyam Sundar S K
2022-07-27 21:40   ` Hans de Goede
2022-07-12 14:58 ` [PATCH v1 15/15] MAINTAINERS: Add AMD PMF driver entry Shyam Sundar S K
2022-07-27 21:41   ` Hans de Goede
2022-07-28 17:44     ` Shyam Sundar S K

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2dc85390-3a45-dec1-934d-09b3f09fa434@redhat.com \
    --to=hdegoede@redhat.com \
    --cc=Patil.Reddy@amd.com \
    --cc=Shyam-sundar.S-k@amd.com \
    --cc=markgross@kernel.org \
    --cc=platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.