From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752606AbdLKO7R (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Dec 2017 09:59:17 -0500 Received: from mga14.intel.com ([192.55.52.115]:32376 "EHLO mga14.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752573AbdLKO7Q (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Dec 2017 09:59:16 -0500 X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.45,392,1508828400"; d="scan'208";a="569296" Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix resume on x86-32 machines To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Pavel Machek , Andrew Lutomirski Cc: Andy Lutomirski , Linus Torvalds , Zhang Rui , Thomas Gleixner , Linux Kernel Mailing List , the arch/x86 maintainers References: <2809506.pL8kVbvXcY@aspire.rjw.lan> <20171210213804.GA4660@amd> <76028A95-1CE1-49AA-9929-9C15FFC520EB@amacapital.net> <151331264.Sjvx2oHGGq@aspire.rjw.lan> From: Jarkko Nikula Message-ID: <2dd7f763-9926-7f36-f2bc-6df72fa798ce@linux.intel.com> Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2017 16:59:11 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <151331264.Sjvx2oHGGq@aspire.rjw.lan> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 12/11/2017 04:22 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Sunday, December 10, 2017 10:58:23 PM CET Andy Lutomirski wrote: >> >>> On Dec 10, 2017, at 1:38 PM, Pavel Machek wrote: >>> >>> >>> After 4.15-rc2, suspend stopped working on Thinkpad X60. 5b06bbc >>> (unintentionally?) reordered stuff with respect to >>> fix_processor_context() on 32-bit and 64-bit. We undo that change on >>> 32-bit. >>> >> >> Can you explain what was wrong with the reordering? Your patch certainly *looks* incorrect. >> >> I'm guessing that the real issue is that 32-bit needs %fs restored early for TLS. > > I *think* you are right. > > Anyway, that should be easy enough to verify. > > Pavel, can you please check if the below change works too? > > --- > arch/x86/power/cpu.c | 3 ++- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > Works here on my test machine. Tested-by: Jarkko Nikula