All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
To: Mohamed Alzayat <alzayat@mpi-sws.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	"Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: Potential bug in soft-dirty bits (with test case)
Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2020 12:51:59 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2e60ad6d-7bdf-e19e-4ad9-6942f76088d3@suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+32v5wCAQ9O+7sioyTroqBqG=MfvZzErVFbcE2EbbwEP0=ZZA@mail.gmail.com>

On 11/30/20 11:37 AM, Mohamed Alzayat wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 27, 2020 at 5:40 PM Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> wrote:
>>
>> On 11/25/20 3:15 PM, Mohamed Alzayat wrote:
>> > Hi Everyone,
>> >
>> > I have noticed a change in the synchrony of updating the soft-dirty
>> > bits in recent kernel versions (5.6+). More precisely, up to kernel
>> > v5.5, the soft-dirty bits as parsed from /proc/pid/pagemap accurately
>> > capture the dirtied pages. Recently, I started testing on kernels v5.6
>> > - v5.9, and I noticed that the soft-dirty bits are not immediately
>> > updated.
>> >
>> > I have prepared a short test that repeatedly causes at least one
>> > memory page to be dirtied, then scans /proc/pid/pagemap counting the
>> > soft-dirty bits. The test fails if this count is zero. In my
>> > observation, this test fails once in every 10-20 trials. The test
>> > defaults to 100 trials and can be found at
>> > https://gitlab.mpi-sws.org/-/snippets/1696
>> >
>> > Is this non-synchronous propagation of soft dirty bits intended? If
>>
>> AFAIK, not. The tracking is done by write-protecting the pages to cause a page
>> fault, so it should be quite synchronous update of page table entries, and
>> reading pagemap is a page table walk of those very entries.
>>
>> But as you have the test, it should be possible to git bisect it? Just do enough
>> trials to be sure enough that no fail means indeed a "good" kernel.
> 
> Thanks for confirming, Vlastimil!
> 
> The first bad commit is: 0758cd8304942292e95a0f750c374533db378b32
> asm-generic/tlb: avoid potential double flush
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=0758cd8304942292e95a0f750c374533db378b32
> 
> Reverting this commit solves the problem, but this might not be the
> right way of fixing it.

Thanks for bisecting! Let's CC people involved in that commit. All important 
should be in the quoted conversation above.

Vlastimil

> 
>>
>> > yes, is there a way to force the soft-dirty bits to be propagated to
>> > the page map entries immediately, or is there an alternative interface
>> > that has the synchronous behavior?
>> >
>> > Thanks in advance,
>> > Mohamed Alzayat
>> >
>>
>>
> 



  reply	other threads:[~2020-11-30 11:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-11-25 14:15 Potential bug in soft-dirty bits (with test case) Mohamed Alzayat
2020-11-27 16:40 ` Vlastimil Babka
2020-11-30 10:37   ` Mohamed Alzayat
2020-11-30 11:51     ` Vlastimil Babka [this message]
2020-11-30 12:02       ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-11-30 12:50         ` Will Deacon
2021-04-20 18:32           ` Mohamed Alzayat

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2e60ad6d-7bdf-e19e-4ad9-6942f76088d3@suse.cz \
    --to=vbabka@suse.cz \
    --cc=alzayat@mpi-sws.org \
    --cc=aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.