From: Shanker R Donthineni <sdonthineni@nvidia.com>
To: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>,
Amey Narkhede <ameynarkhede03@gmail.com>
Cc: Oliver O'Halloran <oohall@gmail.com>,
Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
linux-pci <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Sinan Kaya <okaya@kernel.org>, Vikram Sethi <vsethi@nvidia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] PCI: Enable NO_BUS_RESET quirk for Nvidia GPUs
Date: Wed, 5 May 2021 15:04:18 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2e64d906-d398-a859-413a-c7ab3341de88@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210505131357.07e55042@redhat.com>
Thanks Alex for the detailed explanation.
On 5/5/21 2:13 PM, Alex Williamson wrote:
> I'm also assuming all SoCs integrating this GPU will provide a
> _RST method, but we're also disabling SBR in this series to avoid the
> only other generic reset option we'd have for this device.
All the platforms/SoCs which contain these GPUs will provide ACPI/firmware with
_RST method.
> In the more general case, I'd expect that system firmware isn't going
> to implement an _RST method for a pluggable slot, so we'll lookup the
> ACPI handle, fail to find a _RST method and drop to the next option.
> For a PCI/e slot, at best the _RST method might be included in the _PRR
> scope rather than the device scope to indicate it affects the entire
> slot. That could be something like the #PERST below or a warm reset. I
> don't think we're enabling that here, are we?
No, our_RST method will be included only in a device context (not _PRP).
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-05-05 20:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-04-29 0:49 [PATCH v4 1/2] PCI: Add support for a function level reset based on _RST method Shanker Donthineni
2021-04-29 0:49 ` [PATCH v4 2/2] PCI: Enable NO_BUS_RESET quirk for Nvidia GPUs Shanker Donthineni
2021-04-30 17:01 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2021-04-30 22:11 ` Shanker R Donthineni
2021-05-03 22:42 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2021-05-04 2:07 ` Shanker R Donthineni
2021-05-05 2:12 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2021-05-05 3:51 ` Shanker R Donthineni
2021-05-05 3:56 ` Oliver O'Halloran
2021-05-05 17:40 ` Amey Narkhede
2021-05-05 19:13 ` Alex Williamson
2021-05-05 20:04 ` Shanker R Donthineni [this message]
2021-05-05 20:40 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2021-05-05 12:15 ` Pali Rohár
2021-05-05 15:35 ` Shanker R Donthineni
2021-04-30 18:39 ` [PATCH v4 1/2] PCI: Add support for a function level reset based on _RST method Alex Williamson
2021-04-30 19:05 ` Shanker R Donthineni
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2e64d906-d398-a859-413a-c7ab3341de88@nvidia.com \
--to=sdonthineni@nvidia.com \
--cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
--cc=ameynarkhede03@gmail.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=helgaas@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=okaya@kernel.org \
--cc=oohall@gmail.com \
--cc=vsethi@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.