From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-we0-f175.google.com ([74.125.82.175]) by linuxtogo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SATLJ-0002ZW-FQ for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Wed, 21 Mar 2012 22:45:17 +0100 Received: by mail-we0-f175.google.com with SMTP id a1so1340601wer.6 for ; Wed, 21 Mar 2012 14:36:25 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:x-mailer:in-reply-to:references; bh=JgF2hCDBmbiEpJNuoOtmY7Pwx3uxDN0sNLKU55LPqAc=; b=biTafr2T6osdOTvF9n80mXQeYnuv9qLZrH5WEhiqicWGusZrYoDKtYliNprzknjd5S Cdjx+ZxQQqmmJZjk1zYEJiF09xw8E0GOp8RRh6sCKQlsQmieHYfGp/j80uV5FROVp3I3 eeHXWpSu+ZWycICl934BtR6c4+r4JIby29M/juOlbnE3dQlKn64D1bh8OD4vN7DF2K8P +BJp2DGWJBqsDI2G8TjOef4sFCAFpHpLdJl+IC8DFmdZMyFQUuYRQ8J6Im4PMulMOaNs USXGMHeW/k0pE0YBygtsgzro1N+2I9giNrdE0UlO6NMlPM6Gj++n+7avJmikq4JLVjxg JRWQ== Received: by 10.180.80.104 with SMTP id q8mr12472052wix.14.1332365785628; Wed, 21 Mar 2012 14:36:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([94.230.152.246]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id n8sm12363375wix.10.2012.03.21.14.36.23 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 21 Mar 2012 14:36:23 -0700 (PDT) From: Martin Jansa To: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2012 22:36:06 +0100 Message-Id: <2ec6e0c134d708687c5d3d439b31607cda478dfc.1332365336.git.Martin.Jansa@gmail.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 1.7.8.5 In-Reply-To: References: Subject: [PATCH 01/13] bitbake.conf: use TUNE_PKGARCH instead of TARGET_ARCH in SDK_NAME X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Reply-To: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2012 21:45:17 -0000 * also use weak assignment for SDK_NAME_PREFIX as suggested by khem * TUNE_PKGARCH is not 100% right too, because such SDK image usually has few machine specific packages included (e.g. base-files, securetty, opkg configs) but those are not important for SDK users so it's better to have one SDK for whole e.g. armv7a-vfp-neon then 6 SDK for each machine which would work the same. You can see diff between crespo and om-gta04 SDK here: http://build.shr-project.org/shr-core/sdk/oecore-i686-armv7a-vfp-neon-toolchain-efl-crespo-om-gta04.diff Signed-off-by: Martin Jansa --- meta/conf/bitbake.conf | 4 ++-- 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/meta/conf/bitbake.conf b/meta/conf/bitbake.conf index 07982d7..20a8d3e 100644 --- a/meta/conf/bitbake.conf +++ b/meta/conf/bitbake.conf @@ -365,8 +365,8 @@ PKGDATA_DIR = "${TMPDIR}/pkgdata/${MULTIMACH_TARGET_SYS}" # SDK variables, ################################################################## -SDK_NAME_PREFIX = "oecore" -SDK_NAME = "${SDK_NAME_PREFIX}-${SDK_ARCH}-${TARGET_ARCH}" +SDK_NAME_PREFIX ?= "oecore" +SDK_NAME = "${SDK_NAME_PREFIX}-${SDK_ARCH}-${TUNE_PKGARCH}" SDKPATH = "/usr/local/${SDK_NAME_PREFIX}-${SDK_ARCH}" SDKPATHNATIVE = "${SDKPATH}/sysroots/${SDK_SYS}" -- 1.7.8.5