From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1161659AbcBSL6p (ORCPT ); Fri, 19 Feb 2016 06:58:45 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:55941 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757373AbcBSL6n (ORCPT ); Fri, 19 Feb 2016 06:58:43 -0500 Organization: Red Hat UK Ltd. Registered Address: Red Hat UK Ltd, Amberley Place, 107-111 Peascod Street, Windsor, Berkshire, SI4 1TE, United Kingdom. Registered in England and Wales under Company Registration No. 3798903 From: David Howells In-Reply-To: <1455131523.2538.170.camel@linux.vnet.ibm.com> References: <1455131523.2538.170.camel@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20160119113026.23238.4498.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk> <20160119113240.23238.31018.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk> To: Mimi Zohar Cc: dhowells@redhat.com, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, keyrings@vger.kernel.org, petkan@mip-labs.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 18/20] IMA: Use the system blacklist keyring [ver #2] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <30311.1455883121.1@warthog.procyon.org.uk> Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2016 11:58:41 +0000 Message-ID: <30312.1455883121@warthog.procyon.org.uk> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Mimi Zohar wrote: > As discussed, "restrict_link_by_system_trusted" is not enough. The > certificate being added should be in a revoked list as well. What do you mean be a "revoked list"? There currently isn't such a beast in IMA. The patches I've proposed should make the functionality available approximately the same as exists now. David