From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Shreyansh Jain Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] eal: use different constructor priorities for initcalls Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2017 20:07:47 +0530 Message-ID: <303901dd-da3c-38ea-2979-01ee66387b68@nxp.com> References: <1487152929-23627-1-git-send-email-jblunck@infradead.org> <1487152929-23627-2-git-send-email-jblunck@infradead.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Jan Blunck , Return-path: Received: from NAM01-BN3-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-bn3nam01on0074.outbound.protection.outlook.com [104.47.33.74]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7ECC637A8 for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2017 15:33:01 +0100 (CET) In-Reply-To: <1487152929-23627-2-git-send-email-jblunck@infradead.org> List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On Wednesday 15 February 2017 03:32 PM, Jan Blunck wrote: > This introduces different initcall macros to allow for late registration of > the virtual device bus. > > Signed-off-by: Jan Blunck > --- > lib/librte_eal/common/include/rte_bus.h | 17 ++++++++++++++++- > lib/librte_eal/common/include/rte_eal.h | 12 ++++++++++-- > lib/librte_eal/common/include/rte_tailq.h | 2 +- > 3 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/lib/librte_eal/common/include/rte_bus.h b/lib/librte_eal/common/include/rte_bus.h > index 7c36969..9f161f2 100644 > --- a/lib/librte_eal/common/include/rte_bus.h > +++ b/lib/librte_eal/common/include/rte_bus.h > @@ -50,6 +50,7 @@ extern "C" { > #include > #include > > +#include > #include > #include > > @@ -145,7 +146,21 @@ void rte_bus_dump(FILE *f); > * The constructor has higher priority than PMD constructors. > */ > #define RTE_REGISTER_BUS(nm, bus) \ > -static void __attribute__((constructor(101), used)) businitfn_ ##nm(void) \ > +RTE_EAL_INIT(businitfn_ ##nm); \ > +static void businitfn_ ##nm(void) \ > +{\ > + (bus).name = RTE_STR(nm);\ > + rte_bus_register(&bus); \ > +} > + > +/** > + * Helper for late Bus registration. > + * The constructor still has higher priority than PMD constructors but has > + * lower priority than RTE_REGISTER_BUS. > + */ > +#define RTE_REGISTER_BUS_LATE(nm, bus) \ > +RTE_POST_EAL_INIT(businitfn_ ##nm); \ > +static void businitfn_ ##nm(void) \ > {\ > (bus).name = RTE_STR(nm);\ > rte_bus_register(&bus); \ > diff --git a/lib/librte_eal/common/include/rte_eal.h b/lib/librte_eal/common/include/rte_eal.h > index 03fee50..3a6bd71 100644 > --- a/lib/librte_eal/common/include/rte_eal.h > +++ b/lib/librte_eal/common/include/rte_eal.h > @@ -258,8 +258,16 @@ static inline int rte_gettid(void) > return RTE_PER_LCORE(_thread_id); > } > > -#define RTE_INIT(func) \ > -static void __attribute__((constructor, used)) func(void) > +#define RTE_EAL_INIT(func) \ > +static void __attribute__((constructor(101), used)) func(void) > + > +#define RTE_POST_EAL_INIT(func) \ > +static void __attribute__((constructor(102), used)) func(void) > + > +#define RTE_DEV_INIT(func) \ > +static void __attribute__((constructor(103), used)) func(void) Shouldn't we simply allow this priority to be default to allow for some priority space between buses and default init? > + > +#define RTE_INIT(func) RTE_DEV_INIT(func) > > #ifdef __cplusplus > } > diff --git a/lib/librte_eal/common/include/rte_tailq.h b/lib/librte_eal/common/include/rte_tailq.h > index 3aae098..07ceec1 100644 > --- a/lib/librte_eal/common/include/rte_tailq.h > +++ b/lib/librte_eal/common/include/rte_tailq.h > @@ -148,7 +148,7 @@ struct rte_tailq_head *rte_eal_tailq_lookup(const char *name); > int rte_eal_tailq_register(struct rte_tailq_elem *t); > > #define EAL_REGISTER_TAILQ(t) \ > -RTE_INIT(tailqinitfn_ ##t); \ > +RTE_EAL_INIT(tailqinitfn_ ##t); \ > static void tailqinitfn_ ##t(void) \ > { \ > if (rte_eal_tailq_register(&t) < 0) \ >