From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: handle exit due to INVD in VMX
Date: Sun, 31 Oct 2010 11:00:08 -0700
Message-ID: <30710656-1B22-45B9-AC71-7EB744906A6C@suse.de>
References: <20101031143635.GW26191@redhat.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1081)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: mtosatti@redhat.com, avi@redhat.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org
To: Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com>
Return-path: <kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from cantor2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:42713 "EHLO mx2.suse.de"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1756486Ab0JaSAO (ORCPT <rfc822;kvm@vger.kernel.org>);
	Sun, 31 Oct 2010 14:00:14 -0400
In-Reply-To: <20101031143635.GW26191@redhat.com>
Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <kvm.vger.kernel.org>


On 31.10.2010, at 07:36, Gleb Natapov wrote:

> Call into emulator when INVD instruction is executed by a guest.

Why? This is a poor patch description.

Alex