From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.9 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FC00C4742C for ; Mon, 16 Nov 2020 18:18:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCCF02231B for ; Mon, 16 Nov 2020 18:18:47 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=privacyrequired.com header.i=@privacyrequired.com header.b="DsQ9I23H" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1732029AbgKPSSc (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Nov 2020 13:18:32 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:52356 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1730302AbgKPSSb (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Nov 2020 13:18:31 -0500 Received: from confino.investici.org (confino.investici.org [IPv6:2a00:c38:11e:ffff::a020]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AB143C0613CF; Mon, 16 Nov 2020 10:18:31 -0800 (PST) Received: from mx1.investici.org (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by confino.investici.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CZcl90C9Yz114N; Mon, 16 Nov 2020 18:18:29 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=privacyrequired.com; s=stigmate; t=1605550709; bh=yR555kwwCUU6ZooTL6o5K7/FoyRH7zdLKxUHBYLqnsQ=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=DsQ9I23HwK3WReghUhBeMBbGKVGItNnubtBTHuAdMfGIQIEDdbaugRnXi7+NHU05I Awwi505TxSsIA6kVV7mVVrcqmOBqGAD54qQH592Ut4+bCqJM7YizImHfhsUA5dEl1X 166oMxiGii3vpTEOj+5iHUsJ+EAGJqV9B29k4bRc= Received: from [212.103.72.250] (mx1.investici.org [212.103.72.250]) (Authenticated sender: laniel_francis@privacyrequired.com) by localhost (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4CZcl85v39z10qw; Mon, 16 Nov 2020 18:18:28 +0000 (UTC) From: Francis Laniel To: Jakub Kicinski Cc: Kees Cook , linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/3] Fix inefficiences and rename nla_strlcpy Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2020 19:18:27 +0100 Message-ID: <3073458.2cBt0YhbhG@machine> In-Reply-To: <20201116093243.3557280a@kicinski-fedora-pc1c0hjn.dhcp.thefacebook.com> References: <20201113111133.15011-1-laniel_francis@privacyrequired.com> <3291815.yzSIL3OBH5@machine> <20201116093243.3557280a@kicinski-fedora-pc1c0hjn.dhcp.thefacebook.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org Le lundi 16 novembre 2020, 18:32:43 CET Jakub Kicinski a =E9crit : > On Mon, 16 Nov 2020 18:06:33 +0100 Francis Laniel wrote: > > Le lundi 16 novembre 2020, 17:06:52 CET Jakub Kicinski a =E9crit : > > > On Sun, 15 Nov 2020 18:05:39 +0100 Francis Laniel wrote: > > > > Le dimanche 15 novembre 2020, 01:18:37 CET Jakub Kicinski a =E9crit= : > > > > > On Fri, 13 Nov 2020 10:56:26 -0800 Kees Cook wrote: > > > > > > Thanks! This looks good to me. > > > > > >=20 > > > > > > Jakub, does this look ready to you? > > > > >=20 > > > > > Yup, looks good, sorry! > > > > >=20 > > > > > But it didn't get into patchwork cleanly :/ > > > > >=20 > > > > > One more resend please? (assuming we're expected to take this > > > > > into net-next) > > > >=20 > > > > I will send it again and tag it for net-next. > > > >=20 > > > > Just to know, is patchwork this: > > > > https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/list/ > > >=20 > > > Yes, that's the one. > >=20 > > OK! The tool seems cool. > >=20 > > So normally I resend the patches, but I do not see them in patchwork. > > Is there something am I supposed to do so they can be visible through > > patchwork? >=20 > They were visible, this is your resend: >=20 > https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/list/?series=3D384457&stat= e=3D* >=20 > (note the * at the end, sometimes it gets stripped when clicking on a > link) >=20 > Maybe you checked after I already applied them, patches which had been > "handled" (aka "Action required=3Dno") are not displayed by default. Working of patchwork is now clearer for me, thank you! But yes I think I checked after you applied them.