From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S936316AbcA0Wys (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 Jan 2016 17:54:48 -0500 Received: from v094114.home.net.pl ([79.96.170.134]:52883 "HELO v094114.home.net.pl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S934086AbcA0Wyn (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 Jan 2016 17:54:43 -0500 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" To: Viresh Kumar Cc: "Gautham R. Shenoy" , linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Shilpasri G Bhat , "Juri Lelli Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND] cpufreq: Use list_is_last() to check last entry of the policy list Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2016 23:55:37 +0100 Message-ID: <3098333.ng4zWfoJhM@vostro.rjw.lan> User-Agent: KMail/4.11.5 (Linux/4.5.0-rc1+; KDE/4.11.5; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <20160127063611.GM3322@vireshk> References: <1453715167-26165-1-git-send-email-ego@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <1453876346-21869-1-git-send-email-ego@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20160127063611.GM3322@vireshk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wednesday, January 27, 2016 12:06:11 PM Viresh Kumar wrote: > On 27-01-16, 12:02, Gautham R. Shenoy wrote: > > Currently next_policy() explicitly checks if a policy is the last > > policy in the cpufreq_policy_list. Use the standard list_is_last > > primitive instead. > > > > Cc: Viresh Kumar > > Signed-off-by: Gautham R. Shenoy > > --- > > The earlier version one was based on an Juri's experimental branch. > > I have based this one on linux-pm.git linux-next branch. > > > > drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 6 +++--- > > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c > > index c35e7da..e979ec7 100644 > > --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c > > +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c > > @@ -48,11 +48,11 @@ static struct cpufreq_policy *next_policy(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, > > bool active) > > { > > do { > > - policy = list_next_entry(policy, policy_list); > > - > > /* No more policies in the list */ > > - if (&policy->policy_list == &cpufreq_policy_list) > > + if (list_is_last(&policy->policy_list, &cpufreq_policy_list)) > > return NULL; > > + > > + policy = list_next_entry(policy, policy_list); > > } while (!suitable_policy(policy, active)); > > > > return policy; > > Acked-by: Viresh Kumar Applied, thanks! Rafael