From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755607Ab3HFJpt (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Aug 2013 05:45:49 -0400 Received: from li42-95.members.linode.com ([209.123.162.95]:33479 "EHLO li42-95.members.linode.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755488Ab3HFJpr (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Aug 2013 05:45:47 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] pdev: Fix platform device resource linking Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1085) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii From: Pantelis Antoniou In-Reply-To: <20130806093601.GB27889@kroah.com> Date: Tue, 6 Aug 2013 12:45:42 +0300 Cc: Tony Lindgren , Russell King , =?iso-8859-1?Q?Beno=EEt_Coussno?= , Paul Walmsley , Sourav Poddar , Russ Dill , Felipe Balbi , Koen Kooi , linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <311C42C3-6544-4058-ABE9-F9FAE72DD5CA@antoniou-consulting.com> References: <1375775624-12250-1-git-send-email-panto@antoniou-consulting.com> <1375775624-12250-2-git-send-email-panto@antoniou-consulting.com> <20130806093601.GB27889@kroah.com> To: Greg Kroah-Hartman X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1085) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Greg, On Aug 6, 2013, at 12:36 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > On Tue, Aug 06, 2013 at 10:53:40AM +0300, Pantelis Antoniou wrote: >> Platform device removal uncovered a number of problems with >> the way resources are handled in the core platform code. >> >> Resources now form child/parent linkages and this requires >> proper linking of the resources. On top of that the OF core >> directly creates it's own platform devices. Simplify things >> by providing helper functions that manage the linking properly. > > Ugh, the OF core shouldn't be creating platform devices. Well, yes, I > know it does that today, but ick, ick, ick. > Yep, ick, ick, ick is the correct form. >> Two functions are provided: >> >> platform_device_link_resources(), which links all the >> linkable resources (if not already linked). >> >> and platform_device_unlink_resources(), which unlinks all the >> resources. > > Why would anyone need to call this? I'm getting the feeling that OF > should just have it's own bus of devices to handle this type of mess. > ACPI is going through the same rewrite for this same type of problem > (they did things differently.) I suggest you work with the ACPI > developers to so the same thing they are, to solve it correctly for > everyone. > It's the same problem really. Another bus type might not fly well. The same device driver should be (in theory) be made to work unchanged either on an OF/ACPI/Fex( :) ) setup. What would it take to move all this into driver core? > thanks, > > greg k-h Regards -- Pantelis