From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Monjalon Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 1/5] bond: new link bonding library Date: Tue, 01 Jul 2014 16:26:54 +0200 Message-ID: <3150469.bhtIeyNexg@xps13> References: <1403864324-12022-1-git-send-email-declan.doherty@intel.com> <345C63BAECC1AD42A2EC8C63AFFC3ADC273077A5@IRSMSX101.ger.corp.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: dev-VfR2kkLFssw@public.gmane.org To: "Doherty, Declan" Return-path: In-Reply-To: <345C63BAECC1AD42A2EC8C63AFFC3ADC273077A5-kPTMFJFq+rF9qrmMLTLiibfspsVTdybXVpNB7YpNyf8@public.gmane.org> List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces-VfR2kkLFssw@public.gmane.org Sender: "dev" 2014-07-01 14:19, Doherty, Declan: > Hi Robert, yes I see this could be an issue, although this currently > shouldn=E2=80=99t cause an issue, as the currently supported bonding = modes only > expected to receive data on one slave at any time, if they are being = used > as part of a ether channel but when we add further bonding modes are = which > receive data on multiple slaves this would definitely be a problem. >=20 > Thomas, I=E2=80=99ve tested the above changes, is it possible to inte= grate this > patch with the patchset for link bonding for the rc3. No problem. It will be in. Thanks Declan & Robert --=20 Thomas