From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A431C433EF for ; Fri, 12 Nov 2021 18:21:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A34260F45 for ; Fri, 12 Nov 2021 18:21:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S235342AbhKLSY3 (ORCPT ); Fri, 12 Nov 2021 13:24:29 -0500 Received: from dynamic-077-001-167-197.77.1.pool.telefonica.de ([77.1.167.197]:35100 "EHLO vacharakis.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S235331AbhKLSY1 (ORCPT ); Fri, 12 Nov 2021 13:24:27 -0500 Received: from [192.168.1.209] (router.lan [192.168.1.1]) by vacharakis.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 250A33C38D6; Fri, 12 Nov 2021 19:21:35 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <31548846-8ff4-9297-10b3-4f543ee0a5e0@vacharakis.de> Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2021 19:21:34 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.3.0 Subject: Re: Issue with UAS and" VIA Labs, Inc. VL817 SATA Adaptor" Content-Language: de-DE To: Alan Stern Cc: linux-usb@vger.kernel.org References: <139f5577-4a0c-a073-6320-a2697eddadc6@vacharakis.de> <20211112154052.GB32928@rowland.harvard.edu> <20211112162316.GC32928@rowland.harvard.edu> <20211112175150.GA37212@rowland.harvard.edu> From: DocMAX In-Reply-To: <20211112175150.GA37212@rowland.harvard.edu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-usb@vger.kernel.org The first and more buggy maybe. So you are not going to fix this just blacklist uas by default? I was so happy that i got a uas capable device and now the joy is over... :-( Is there detailed information of the uas/usb-storage differences? (Very detailed, not just "it's faster") On 12.11.21 18:51, Alan Stern wrote: > Wow. Judging by the serial number values, you got the first four > devices of this sort ever made. (That is, unless they use the same > serial numbers on all of their devices!) > > Anyway, the patch below should accomplish the same effect as the > module parameter override you've been using. Let us know if it works > properly.