From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Subject: Re: master/main branch renaming and bitbake To: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org From: "Benjamin Gilbert" X-Originating-Location: New York, New York, US (98.7.211.151) X-Originating-Platform: Linux Firefox 88 User-Agent: GROUPS.IO Web Poster MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Thu, 13 May 2021 12:02:04 -0700 References: In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <3159.1620932524790775077@lists.openembedded.org> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="VoNUsY63NEm5GcjVNVLg" --VoNUsY63NEm5GcjVNVLg Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, May 13, 2021 at 06:36 AM, Bruce Ashfield wrote: >=20 >=20 >> The problem is that your build system is penalizing upstream projects t= hat >> are trying to migrate >> to using `main`. >=20 > Similarly those same projects are completely deleting those branches, > versus no longer making them the default. Which is penalizing the > existing users. Deleting the branch penalizes existing developers, which projects might be= willing to do.=C2=A0 Git branch names don't usually have any effect on use= rs. --Benjamin Gilbert --VoNUsY63NEm5GcjVNVLg Content-Type: text/html; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, May 13, 2021 at 06:36 AM, Bruce Ashfield wrote:
The problem is that your build system is penalizing upstream p= rojects that are trying to migrate
to using `main`.
Similarly those same projects are completely deleting those branches,
versus no longer making them the default. Which is penalizing the
exi= sting users.
Deleting the branch penalizes existing developers, which projects might be= willing to do.  Git branch names don't usually have any effect on use= rs.

--Benjamin Gilbert --VoNUsY63NEm5GcjVNVLg--