From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from e24smtp04.br.ibm.com (e24smtp04.br.ibm.com [32.104.18.25]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3qbbQ11F6pzDq7h for ; Fri, 1 Apr 2016 07:16:40 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from localhost by e24smtp04.br.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Thu, 31 Mar 2016 17:16:36 -0300 Received: from d24relay01.br.ibm.com (d24relay01.br.ibm.com [9.8.31.16]) by d24dlp02.br.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A67431DC0070 for ; Thu, 31 Mar 2016 16:16:28 -0400 (EDT) Received: from d24av03.br.ibm.com (d24av03.br.ibm.com [9.8.31.95]) by d24relay01.br.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id u2VJEIm35071052 for ; Thu, 31 Mar 2016 16:14:18 -0300 Received: from d24av03.br.ibm.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by d24av03.br.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/NCO v10.0 AVout) with ESMTP id u2VKGXB7003060 for ; Thu, 31 Mar 2016 17:16:33 -0300 From: Thiago Jung Bauermann To: "Naveen N. Rao" Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Remove kretprobe_trampoline_holder. Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2016 17:16:30 -0300 Message-ID: <3165647.AEF6NlnZx5@hactar> In-Reply-To: <20160331082311.GA17907@naverao1-tp.ibm.com> References: <3qWbvb0yVwz9sdm@ozlabs.org> <1459195592-6559-1-git-send-email-bauerman@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20160331082311.GA17907@naverao1-tp.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Am Donnerstag, 31 M=C3=A4rz 2016, 13:53:11 schrieb Naveen N. Rao: > You should indent the above output -- in this specific case, the star= t > marker interferes with git am. >=20 > Apart from that, I have tested this patch and kretprobe works fine. A= > minor nit I had is that we end up with a non-dot function in .text > without a corresponding function descriptor for kretprobe_trampoline.= > But, since this is a trampoline, I think that is good. So, for this > patch: > Reviewed-by: Naveen N. Rao Thanks for the tips and the review. I fixed the issue you mentioned and= sent=20 a new patch with your Reviewed-by. Also thanks for fixing the vmlinux-kallsyms issue in ppc64le. I didn=E2= =80=99t=20 comment on the patches because I=E2=80=99m not very familiar with the c= ode in=20 question. --=20 []'s Thiago Jung Bauermann IBM Linux Technology Center