All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
To: Andrew Rybchenko <arybchenko@solarflare.com>
Cc: ferruh.yigit@intel.com, dev@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] ethdev: complete closing to free all resources
Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2018 16:57:35 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3176257.grtejztXq6@xps> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <402147ea-d88a-27a0-25a9-905c79fb5b89@solarflare.com>

10/09/2018 10:54, Andrew Rybchenko:
> On 09/10/2018 11:42 AM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > 10/09/2018 10:03, Andrew Rybchenko:
> >> On 09/08/2018 02:39 AM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> >>> After closing a port, it cannot be restarted.
> >>> So there is no reason to not free all associated resources.
> >>>
> >>> The last step was done with rte_eth_dev_detach() which is deprecated.
> >>> Instead of removing the associated rte_device, the driver should check
> >>> if no more port (ethdev, cryptodev, etc) is still open for the device.
> >>> Then the device resources can be freed by the driver inside the
> >>> dev_close() driver callback operation.
> >>>
> >>> The last ethdev freeing (dev_private and final release), which were done
> >>> by rte_eth_dev_detach(), are now done at the end of rte_eth_dev_close().
> >> For me, it sounds more logical to kill dev_close and keep detach.
> >> IMHO, dev_close is artificial and hardly useful. detach is a local pair
> >> to attach.
> > I don't get your point.
> >
> > In order to free a port, we need close + detach.
> > We can keep only one.
> > I choose close because:
> > 	1) attach/detach are deprecated
> > 	2) probe/close is a more obvious pair
> > 	3) we need the driver to free the lower level resources
> 
> Yes, I'm sorry I used bad terminology.
> We have probe/remove pair for both PCI and vdev drivers and I mean
> that remove is a better candidate to be kept (as a pair for probe which
> allocates all resources).

OK, yes probe/remove is the pair at EAL level.
But if we want to request removal at ethdev level, rte_eth_dev_close
is the function.

Note that there is no function to request creation of an ethdev port.
Adding a new port is done only by the PMD during probing (rte_bus level).

  reply	other threads:[~2018-09-12 14:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 78+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-09-07 23:39 [RFC] ethdev: complete closing to free all resources Thomas Monjalon
2018-09-10  8:03 ` Andrew Rybchenko
2018-09-10  8:42   ` Thomas Monjalon
2018-09-10  8:54     ` Andrew Rybchenko
2018-09-12 14:57       ` Thomas Monjalon [this message]
2018-09-12 15:44         ` Andrew Rybchenko
2018-09-28 12:46 ` Ferruh Yigit
2018-10-09 22:00   ` Thomas Monjalon
2018-10-09 22:17 ` [PATCH v2] ethdev: complete closing of port Thomas Monjalon
2018-10-10  6:15   ` Andrew Rybchenko
2018-10-10  7:44     ` Thomas Monjalon
2018-10-10  7:50       ` Andrew Rybchenko
2018-10-10  8:39         ` Thomas Monjalon
2018-10-10 15:01           ` Andrew Rybchenko
2018-10-10 16:43             ` Thomas Monjalon
2018-10-10 18:01               ` Andrew Rybchenko
2018-10-10 19:03                 ` Thomas Monjalon
2018-10-14 23:20 ` [PATCH v3 0/2] ethdev port freeing Thomas Monjalon
2018-10-14 23:20   ` [PATCH v3 1/2] ethdev: free all common data when releasing port Thomas Monjalon
2018-10-16 11:16     ` Andrew Rybchenko
2018-10-16 12:22       ` Thomas Monjalon
2018-10-16 12:47         ` Andrew Rybchenko
2018-10-16 12:52           ` Thomas Monjalon
2018-10-16 12:55             ` Andrew Rybchenko
2018-10-14 23:20   ` [PATCH v3 2/2] ethdev: complete closing of port Thomas Monjalon
2018-10-16 11:24     ` Andrew Rybchenko
2018-10-16 12:25       ` Thomas Monjalon
2018-10-17  1:54 ` [PATCH v3 0/4] ethdev port freeing Thomas Monjalon
2018-10-17  1:54   ` [PATCH v3 1/4] app/testpmd: allow detaching a port not closed Thomas Monjalon
2018-10-17  2:06     ` Thomas Monjalon
2018-10-17  6:26     ` Andrew Rybchenko
2018-10-17  8:20       ` Thomas Monjalon
2018-10-17 10:30         ` Iremonger, Bernard
2018-10-17 11:33           ` Thomas Monjalon
2018-10-17  1:54   ` [PATCH v3 2/4] ethdev: free all common data when releasing port Thomas Monjalon
2018-10-17  7:13     ` Andrew Rybchenko
2018-10-17  8:22       ` Thomas Monjalon
2018-10-17  1:54   ` [PATCH v3 3/4] ethdev: remove release function for secondary process Thomas Monjalon
2018-10-17  7:25     ` Andrew Rybchenko
2018-10-17  9:27       ` Thomas Monjalon
2018-10-17  1:54   ` [PATCH v3 4/4] ethdev: complete closing of port Thomas Monjalon
2018-10-17  2:12     ` Thomas Monjalon
2018-10-17 10:24   ` [PATCH v3 0/4] ethdev port freeing Shreyansh Jain
2018-10-17 11:31     ` Thomas Monjalon
2018-10-18  1:23 ` [PATCH v5 0/6] " Thomas Monjalon
2018-10-18  1:23   ` [PATCH v5 1/6] app/testpmd: fix ports list after removing several at once Thomas Monjalon
2018-10-18 10:40     ` Iremonger, Bernard
2018-10-18 11:29       ` Thomas Monjalon
2018-10-18 11:41         ` Iremonger, Bernard
2018-10-18 14:21           ` Thomas Monjalon
2018-10-18 16:42             ` Iremonger, Bernard
2018-10-18 17:06               ` Thomas Monjalon
2018-10-18 11:49         ` Wisam Monther
2018-10-18 13:22           ` Iremonger, Bernard
2018-10-18  1:23   ` [PATCH v5 2/6] app/testpmd: allow detaching a port not closed Thomas Monjalon
2018-10-18  7:45     ` Andrew Rybchenko
2018-10-18 10:51       ` Iremonger, Bernard
2018-10-18 11:24         ` Thomas Monjalon
2018-10-18  1:23   ` [PATCH v5 3/6] ethdev: fix doxygen comments of shared data fields Thomas Monjalon
2018-10-18  7:11     ` Andrew Rybchenko
2018-10-18  1:24   ` [PATCH v5 4/6] ethdev: free all common data when releasing port Thomas Monjalon
2018-10-18  7:13     ` Andrew Rybchenko
2018-10-18  1:24   ` [PATCH v5 5/6] ethdev: remove release function for secondary process Thomas Monjalon
2018-10-18  7:15     ` Andrew Rybchenko
2018-10-18  1:24   ` [PATCH v5 6/6] ethdev: complete closing of port Thomas Monjalon
2018-10-18  8:33     ` Andrew Rybchenko
2018-10-18  9:32       ` Thomas Monjalon
2018-10-19  2:07 ` [PATCH v6 0/6] ethdev port freeing Thomas Monjalon
2018-10-19  2:07   ` [PATCH v6 1/6] app/testpmd: update port list for multiple removals Thomas Monjalon
2018-10-19 14:32     ` Iremonger, Bernard
2018-10-19  2:07   ` [PATCH v6 2/6] app/testpmd: allow detaching a port not closed Thomas Monjalon
2018-10-19 14:32     ` Iremonger, Bernard
2018-10-19  2:07   ` [PATCH v6 3/6] ethdev: fix doxygen comments of shared data fields Thomas Monjalon
2018-10-19  2:07   ` [PATCH v6 4/6] ethdev: free all common data when releasing port Thomas Monjalon
2018-10-19  2:07   ` [PATCH v6 5/6] ethdev: remove release function for secondary process Thomas Monjalon
2018-10-19  2:07   ` [PATCH v6 6/6] ethdev: complete closing of port Thomas Monjalon
2018-10-19 10:13     ` Andrew Rybchenko
2018-10-22 15:43   ` [PATCH v6 0/6] ethdev port freeing Ferruh Yigit

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3176257.grtejztXq6@xps \
    --to=thomas@monjalon.net \
    --cc=arybchenko@solarflare.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.