From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
Subject: Re: 18.08 build error on ppc64el - bool as vector type
Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2018 10:36:46 +0200
Message-ID: <3195236.p3PdHVbfnl@xps>
References: <CAATJJ0Ld_3o7FzZaoRO_eK2qWDpBuYg6QtKDCVjEUh22V_7k=w@mail.gmail.com>
 <20180829131605.GJ3695@6wind.com>
 <CAATJJ0Jn9PTu8QpdMZ6t5j-ThKH_fn-Ucy24oLutG=fKfUdXcQ@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, adrien.mazarguil@6wind.com, Luca Boccassi <bluca@debian.org>
To: Christian Ehrhardt <christian.ehrhardt@canonical.com>,
 Gowrishankar Muthukrishnan <gowrishankar.m@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
 Chao Zhu <chaozhu@linux.vnet.ibm.com>, pradeep@us.ibm.com,
 Alfredo Mendoza <mendoza1@us.ibm.com>,
 Gowrishankar Muthukrishnan <gowrishankar.m@in.ibm.com>,
 Gowrishankar Muthukrishnan <gowrishankar.m@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
 Kevin Reilly <kjreilly@us.ibm.com>
Return-path: <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>
Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com (out1-smtp.messagingengine.com
 [66.111.4.25]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2443B2B92
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Thu, 30 Aug 2018 10:36:52 +0200 (CEST)
In-Reply-To: <CAATJJ0Jn9PTu8QpdMZ6t5j-ThKH_fn-Ucy24oLutG=fKfUdXcQ@mail.gmail.com>
List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org
Sender: "dev" <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>

29/08/2018 16:37, Christian Ehrhardt:
> Why is no-one of IBM/Power world replying at all?
> There not even was a "oh yeah, <whatever the content would be>" mail by
> them.
> Is in fact ppc64 support in DPDK dead or at least "unmaintained"?
> This is something that mid term has to be sorted out - I tried to pull some
> strings to get attention "there" but so far I'm waiting for a reply.
> I'd say 18.11 should not be released with a clear re-confirmation of ppc64
> maintainance ppc64 by "someone".

I tend to agree.

Let's try again:

Chao, are you still available for DPDK PPC maintenance?

SHOULD WE DECLARE DPDK NOT SUPPORTED ON PPC64?