From: Mat Martineau <mathew.j.martineau@linux.intel.com>
To: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
Cc: mptcp@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 mptcp-next 0/4] mptcp: just another xmit path refactor
Date: Fri, 3 Sep 2021 13:11:17 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <319eb0-91a3-fceb-d780-2e7f96ca4232@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1630595171.git.pabeni@redhat.com>
On Thu, 2 Sep 2021, Paolo Abeni wrote:
> Eric want to revert the tcp_tx_skb_cache. MPTCP relies on it
> for skb allocation. Before the revert we need to refactor our
> xmit path.
>
> Patch 1 exposes some needed helpers (endorsed by Eric)
> Patch 2 contains the nasty new code
> Patch 3 revert some core TCP changes not needed anymore
> and patch 4 is Eric's revert.
>
> This iteration should hopefully solve the OoB issues I observed with
> the previous attempt, changes documented in patch 2.
>
> Eric Dumazet (1):
> tcp: remove sk_{tr}x_skb_cache
>
> Paolo Abeni (3):
> tcp: expose the tcp_mark_push() and skb_entail() helpers
> mptcp: stop relaying on tcp_tx_skb_cache.
> Partially revert "tcp: factor out tcp_build_frag()"
>
> Documentation/networking/ip-sysctl.rst | 8 --
> include/net/sock.h | 19 ----
> include/net/tcp.h | 4 +-
> net/ipv4/af_inet.c | 4 -
> net/ipv4/sysctl_net_ipv4.c | 12 --
> net/ipv4/tcp.c | 147 +++++++++----------------
> net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c | 6 -
> net/ipv6/tcp_ipv6.c | 6 -
> net/mptcp/protocol.c | 132 +++++++++++++---------
> 9 files changed, 132 insertions(+), 206 deletions(-)
>
> --
> 2.26.3
It's ok to apply the series to the export branch. Before we upstream it,
can Paolo send a squash-to patch for #2 that removes the
WARN_ON_ONCE(!mpext)?
Reviewed-by: Mat Martineau <mathew.j.martineau@linux.intel.com>
--
Mat Martineau
Intel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-09-03 20:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-09-02 15:52 [PATCH v2 mptcp-next 0/4] mptcp: just another xmit path refactor Paolo Abeni
2021-09-02 15:52 ` [PATCH v2 mptcp-next 1/4] tcp: expose the tcp_mark_push() and skb_entail() helpers Paolo Abeni
2021-09-02 15:52 ` [PATCH v2 mptcp-next 2/4] mptcp: stop relaying on tcp_tx_skb_cache Paolo Abeni
2021-09-03 0:30 ` Mat Martineau
2021-09-03 13:58 ` Paolo Abeni
2021-09-03 17:07 ` Mat Martineau
2021-09-03 11:28 ` Matthieu Baerts
2021-09-03 17:18 ` Paolo Abeni
2021-09-03 17:47 ` Matthieu Baerts
2021-09-04 8:00 ` Matthieu Baerts
2021-09-06 7:10 ` Paolo Abeni
2021-09-02 15:52 ` [PATCH v2 mptcp-next 3/4] Partially revert "tcp: factor out tcp_build_frag()" Paolo Abeni
2021-09-02 15:52 ` [PATCH v2 mptcp-next 4/4] tcp: remove sk_{tr}x_skb_cache Paolo Abeni
2021-09-03 20:11 ` Mat Martineau [this message]
2021-09-04 8:00 ` [PATCH v2 mptcp-next 0/4] mptcp: just another xmit path refactor Matthieu Baerts
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=319eb0-91a3-fceb-d780-2e7f96ca4232@linux.intel.com \
--to=mathew.j.martineau@linux.intel.com \
--cc=mptcp@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.