Re: [PATCH 1/4] x86: replace __ASM_{CL,ST}AC

[Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>]

On 28.07.2020 11:06, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 09:47:52PM +0200, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 27.07.2020 16:55, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
>>> On Wed, Jul 15, 2020 at 12:48:14PM +0200, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>>> --- /dev/null
>>>> +++ b/xen/include/asm-x86/asm-defns.h
>>>
>>> Maybe this could be asm-insn.h or a different name? I find it
>>> confusing to have asm-defns.h and an asm_defs.h.
>>
>> While indeed I anticipated a reply to this effect, I don't consider
>> asm-insn.h or asm-macros.h suitable: We don't want to limit this
>> header to a more narrow purpose than "all sorts of definition", I
>> don't think. Hence I chose that name despite its similarity to the
>> C header's one.
> 
> I think it's confusing, but I also think the whole magic we do with
> asm includes is already confusing (me), so if you and Andrew agree
> this is the best name I'm certainly fine with it. FWIW:
> 
> Reviewed-by: Roger Pau Monné <roger.pau@citrix.com>
> 
> Please quote the clac/stac instructions in order to match the other
> usages of ALTERNATIVE.

We're not consistently quoting when there's just a single word, see
in particular spec_ctrl_asm.h. And thinking about it again I also
don't see why we would want or need to enforce quotation when none
is needed. Therefore both here and in patch 2 I'll keep (or make,
when I touch a line anyway) things consistently unquoted where no
quotes are needed. Please let me know if your R-b holds without the
requested adjustment.

Jan