From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga03.intel.com (mga03.intel.com [134.134.136.65]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF71A7FBF9 for ; Mon, 25 Nov 2019 12:07:27 +0000 (UTC) X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from fmsmga005.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.32]) by orsmga103.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 25 Nov 2019 04:07:28 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.69,241,1571727600"; d="scan'208";a="408289133" Received: from xsanroma-mobl1.ger.corp.intel.com (HELO blackadder.local) ([10.249.34.24]) by fmsmga005.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 25 Nov 2019 04:07:26 -0800 To: Phil Blundell , Richard Purdie References: <20191120134455.125118-8-alex.kanavin@gmail.com> <20191120194927.GA28030@localhost> <20191120213844.ome6ota74rmgosy3@pbcl.net> <20191120223207.6cuuklpgrzuhqug3@pbcl.net> <20191120231812.GB3962@localhost> <238a39c7-b794-aaa0-1da6-4b585078f447@intel.com> <20191121135942.h776ktsg6jwow4sj@pbcl.net> From: Ross Burton Organization: Intel Corporation (UK) Ltd. - Co. Reg. #1134945 - Pipers Way, Swindon SN3 1RJ Message-ID: <32d99e6a-b196-6d1d-dac2-a0e1ccfa2c75@intel.com> Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2019 12:07:25 +0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.9.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20191121135942.h776ktsg6jwow4sj@pbcl.net> Cc: OE-core , Adrian Bunk Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/11] lrzsz: remove the recipe X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2019 12:07:27 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-GB Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 21/11/2019 13:59, Phil Blundell wrote: > I also have at least a passing fondness for lrzsz and if a small amount > of maintenance now will suffice to keep it working for another 21 years > then I think I would consider that a good outcome. I will have a quick > look at the code and see if I can fix whatever is apparently problematic > about it. If you can send a patch sooner rather than later for lrzsz to fix the build with modern gettext then that would be *awesome*, as this recipe is the sole blocker. Ross