From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:42543) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XW1i6-0004YN-Tx for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 22 Sep 2014 07:23:19 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XW1i0-0002St-3C for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 22 Sep 2014 07:23:14 -0400 Received: from szxga02-in.huawei.com ([119.145.14.65]:10804) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XW1hz-0002RN-7Y for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 22 Sep 2014 07:23:08 -0400 From: "Gonglei (Arei)" Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2014 11:22:34 +0000 Message-ID: <33183CC9F5247A488A2544077AF1902086DD915A@SZXEMA503-MBS.china.huawei.com> References: <1410792279-2488-1-git-send-email-arei.gonglei@huawei.com> <20140922083421.GA13006@redhat.com> <541FE889.3050209@redhat.com> <33183CC9F5247A488A2544077AF1902086DD90B3@SZXEMA503-MBS.china.huawei.com> <541FF3F9.5060705@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <541FF3F9.5060705@redhat.com> Content-Language: zh-CN Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/3] Fix confused output for alias properties List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Paolo Bonzini , "Michael S. Tsirkin" Cc: "agraf@suse.de" , "Huangweidong (C)" , "aliguori@amazon.com" , "Huangpeng (Peter)" , "qemu-devel@nongnu.org" , "stefanha@redhat.com" , "lcapitulino@redhat.com" > From: Paolo Bonzini [mailto:paolo.bonzini@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Paolo > Bonzini > Sent: Monday, September 22, 2014 6:04 PM > To: Gonglei (Arei); Michael S. Tsirkin > Cc: Huangweidong (C); aliguori@amazon.com; qemu-devel@nongnu.org; > agraf@suse.de; stefanha@redhat.com; Huangpeng (Peter); > lcapitulino@redhat.com > Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] Fix confused output for alias properties >=20 > Il 22/09/2014 11:33, Gonglei (Arei) ha scritto: > > Yes, I knew this issue which object A's property name may > > is not the same with object B, so I had posted v2 to fix it. >=20 > This doesn't change the fact that ObjectProperty is a generic struct, > and adding alias-specific fields there is wrong. >=20 OK, Maybe I should find other ways to attach this purpose and avoid layering violation. Thanks! Best regards, -Gonglei