From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:45117) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XYZls-0002ul-7J for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 29 Sep 2014 08:09:45 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XYZln-0005vP-E8 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 29 Sep 2014 08:09:40 -0400 Received: from szxga03-in.huawei.com ([119.145.14.66]:13225) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XYZlm-0005uW-PJ for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 29 Sep 2014 08:09:35 -0400 From: "Gonglei (Arei)" Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2014 12:09:06 +0000 Message-ID: <33183CC9F5247A488A2544077AF1902086DDCCC8@SZXEMA503-MBS.china.huawei.com> References: <1411721147-11712-1-git-send-email-arei.gonglei@huawei.com> <20140926162125.71ea6598.cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com> <33183CC9F5247A488A2544077AF1902086DDC6DD@SZXEMA503-MBS.china.huawei.com> <20140929125309.3b3483d0.cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com> In-Reply-To: <20140929125309.3b3483d0.cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com> Content-Language: zh-CN Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH RESEND 0/9] virtio: fix virtio child recount in transports List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Cornelia Huck Cc: "Huangweidong (C)" , "mst@redhat.com" , "armbru@redhat.com" , Luonengjun , "agraf@suse.de" , "qemu-devel@nongnu.org" , "borntraeger@de.ibm.com" , "stefanha@redhat.com" , "pbonzini@redhat.com" , "Huangpeng (Peter)" , "rth@twiddle.net" > From: Cornelia Huck [mailto:cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com] > Sent: Monday, September 29, 2014 6:53 PM > Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND 0/9] virtio: fix virtio child recount in trans= ports >=20 > On Sat, 27 Sep 2014 10:37:23 +0000 > "Gonglei (Arei)" wrote: >=20 > > > > One thing I noticed is that the various devices end up with similar > > > > code in the end: > > > > > > > > object_initialize(&dev->vdev, sizeof(dev->vdev), TYPE_WHATEVER= ); > > > > object_property_add_child(obj, "virtio-backend", > > > OBJECT(&dev->vdev), > > > > NULL); > > > > object_unref(OBJECT(&dev->vdev)); > > > > qdev_alias_all_properties(DEVICE(&dev->vdev), obj); > > > > > > > > Would it make sense to add a helper function for that? > > > > > > > Sorry, I'm afraid this is not helpful. Because dev and dev->vdev is dif= ferent > > for different virtio devices, like VirtIOBlkPCI(and its vdev is VirtIOB= lock), > > VirtIONetPCI(and its vdev is VirtIONet). They have no the same paramete= rs > > for above code segment. :) >=20 > Hm... >=20 > void virtio_instance_init_common(Object *proxydev, > DeviceState *vdev, > size_t vdevsize, > const char *vdevname) > { > object_initialize(vdev, vdevsize, vdevname); > object_property_add_child(proxydev, "virtio-backend", OBJECT(vdev), > NULL); > object_unref(OBJECT(vdev)); > qdev_alias_all_properties(vdev, proxydev); > } >=20 > and have the initializers call >=20 > virtio_instance_init_common(obj, DEVICE(&dev->vdev), sizeof(dev->vdev), > TYPE_WHATEVER); >=20 > ? OK, it looks good that pass all parameters to one wrapper function.=20 Will do this in next version. Thanks, Cornelia. :) Best regards, -Gonglei