Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 4/9] lib: s390x: uv: Fix share return value and print

[Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>]

On 22/09/2021 09.18, Janosch Frank wrote:
> Let's only return 0/1 for success/failure respectively.
> If needed we can later add rc/rrc pointers so we can check for the
> reasons of cc==1 cases like we do in the kernel.
> 
> As share might also be used in snippets it's best not to use prints to

Maybe: s/share/share()/
... so that it is clear that you're talking about the function here...

> avoid linking problems so lets remove the report_info().
> 
> Signed-off-by: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>
> ---
>   lib/s390x/asm/uv.h | 9 +--------
>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 8 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/lib/s390x/asm/uv.h b/lib/s390x/asm/uv.h
> index ec10d1c4..2f099553 100644
> --- a/lib/s390x/asm/uv.h
> +++ b/lib/s390x/asm/uv.h
> @@ -219,15 +219,8 @@ static inline int share(unsigned long addr, u16 cmd)
>   		.header.len = sizeof(uvcb),
>   		.paddr = addr
>   	};
> -	int cc;
>   
> -	cc = uv_call(0, (u64)&uvcb);
> -	if (!cc && uvcb.header.rc == UVC_RC_EXECUTED)
> -		return 0;
> -
> -	report_info("uv_call: cmd %04x cc %d response code: %04x", cc, cmd,
> -		    uvcb.header.rc);
> -	return -1;
> +	return uv_call(0, (u64)&uvcb);
>   }

Acked-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>