On Tuesday, 5 February 2019 20.24.10 CET Linus Lüssing wrote:
[...]
> Another thought, if all this is too vague for now... 

Yes, it is to vague for the integration in netlink :D

> what about
> ommiting the BATADV_ATTR_MULTICAST_(MODE)_ENABLED for now and use
> a reverse logic instead? Like
> BATADV_ATTR_MULTICAST_FORCEFLOOD_ENABLED, defaulting to false.

Would be fine for me. But it is rather odd to map this to the batctl 
multicast_mode. But the name is explaining quite well what it does
and you can later rewrite the batctl part.

Kind regards,
	Sven