diff for duplicates of <334a114a-bb59-9582-a913-efbb01bd68c5@huawei.com>
diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N1/1.txt
index 0524585..9d2e90c 100644
--- a/a/1.txt
+++ b/N1/1.txt
@@ -9,17 +9,17 @@ On 27/09/2018 04:00, Andi Kleen wrote:
It no longer reverts cleanly. And the previous patch - 4ca69ca9db3a -
did not have this crash:
-root@localhost:~# ./perf_debug_ record -e armv8_pmuv3_0/br_mis_pred/ sleep 1
+root at localhost:~# ./perf_debug_ record -e armv8_pmuv3_0/br_mis_pred/ sleep 1
[ perf record: Woken up 1 times to write data ]
[ perf record: Captured and wrote 0.001 MB perf.data (6 samples) ]
-root@localhost:~#
+root at localhost:~#
>
> First thing I would also try is to run with valgrind or ASan and see if it
> reports anything.
Here's the valgrind output:
-root@localhost:~#valgrind --leak-check=yes ./perf_debug_ record -e
+root at localhost:~#valgrind --leak-check=yes ./perf_debug_ record -e
armv8_pmuv3_0/br_mis_pred/ sleep 1
==16025== Memcheck, a memory error detector
==16025== Copyright (C) 2002-2015, and GNU GPL'd, by Julian Seward et al.
@@ -206,7 +206,7 @@ shown.
==16025==
==16025== For counts of detected and suppressed errors, rerun with: -v
==16025== ERROR SUMMARY: 3 errors from 3 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
-root@localhost:~#
+root at localhost:~#
(pretty much the same as previous patch)
diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N1/content_digest
index 3311f38..60cc98c 100644
--- a/a/content_digest
+++ b/N1/content_digest
@@ -5,29 +5,16 @@
"ref\00020180927030035.GF28040\@tassilo.jf.intel.com\0"
]
[
- "From\0John Garry <john.garry\@huawei.com>\0"
+ "From\0john.garry\@huawei.com (John Garry)\0"
]
[
- "Subject\0Re: perf segmentation fault from NULL dereference\0"
+ "Subject\0perf segmentation fault from NULL dereference\0"
]
[
"Date\0Tue, 2 Oct 2018 11:20:46 +0100\0"
]
[
- "To\0Andi Kleen <ak\@linux.intel.com>\0"
-]
-[
- "Cc\0Jiri Olsa <jolsa\@redhat.com>",
- " Ingo Molnar <mingo\@redhat.com>",
- " Peter Zijlstra <peterz\@infradead.org>",
- " Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme\@kernel.org>",
- " Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin\@linux.intel.com>",
- " Linuxarm <linuxarm\@huawei.com>",
- " linux-arm-kernel\@lists.infradead.org <linux-arm-kernel\@lists.infradead.org>",
- " linux-kernel\@vger.kernel.org <linux-kernel\@vger.kernel.org>",
- " Namhyung Kim <namhyung\@kernel.org>",
- " Will Deacon <will.deacon\@arm.com>",
- " Mark Rutland <mark.rutland\@arm.com>\0"
+ "To\0linux-arm-kernel\@lists.infradead.org\0"
]
[
"\0000:1\0"
@@ -47,17 +34,17 @@
"\n",
"It no longer reverts cleanly. And the previous patch - 4ca69ca9db3a - \n",
"did not have this crash:\n",
- "root\@localhost:~# ./perf_debug_ record -e armv8_pmuv3_0/br_mis_pred/ sleep 1\n",
+ "root at localhost:~# ./perf_debug_ record -e armv8_pmuv3_0/br_mis_pred/ sleep 1\n",
"[ perf record: Woken up 1 times to write data ]\n",
"[ perf record: Captured and wrote 0.001 MB perf.data (6 samples) ]\n",
- "root\@localhost:~#\n",
+ "root at localhost:~#\n",
"\n",
">\n",
"> First thing I would also try is to run with valgrind or ASan and see if it\n",
"> reports anything.\n",
"\n",
"Here's the valgrind output:\n",
- "root\@localhost:~#valgrind --leak-check=yes ./perf_debug_ record -e \n",
+ "root at localhost:~#valgrind --leak-check=yes ./perf_debug_ record -e \n",
"armv8_pmuv3_0/br_mis_pred/ sleep 1\n",
"==16025== Memcheck, a memory error detector\n",
"==16025== Copyright (C) 2002-2015, and GNU GPL'd, by Julian Seward et al.\n",
@@ -244,7 +231,7 @@
"==16025==\n",
"==16025== For counts of detected and suppressed errors, rerun with: -v\n",
"==16025== ERROR SUMMARY: 3 errors from 3 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)\n",
- "root\@localhost:~#\n",
+ "root at localhost:~#\n",
"\n",
"(pretty much the same as previous patch)\n",
"\n",
@@ -258,4 +245,4 @@
">"
]
-b0b2b99557aa4cfee2f734eb21c65eb0dc5a0622905d630b3aa73c641475cfc4
+a0121291552558f6943a995ae369c10d5e3bb3c5d45872ad1e9955e23c8065d0
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.