All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>
To: Ian Jackson <ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com>
Cc: Julien Grall <julien.grall@arm.com>, xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
Subject: Re: [linux-linus test] 104237: regressions - FAIL
Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2017 14:09:35 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3351eb65-d6f2-0aef-eda4-9913980920c3@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <22657.90.61774.424877@mariner.uk.xensource.com>

On 01/19/2017 01:07 PM, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Boris Ostrovsky writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [linux-linus test] 104237: regressions - FAIL"):
>> On 01/18/2017 10:05 AM, osstest service owner wrote:
>>>  build-armhf-pvops             5 kernel-build              fail REGR. vs. 59254
>> ARM build seems to be caused by some sort of a timeout. The script
>> allows about 2.5 hours for the build to complete and it looks like it is
>> close to finishing it. Hard to say why it takes that long but I see no
>> build errors --- IIUIC the build is aborted due to the timeout.
> 2.5 hours!  How long should it take do you think ?

I don't have much experience with ARM HW but on my x86_64 desktop it's
under 5 minutes. Of course, we may have different config files but still...

And those 2.5 hours is almost all for the actual build --- from what I
see git clones are done pretty quickly.

>
> I mean, I can increase the timeout, but this already seems quite
> unreasonable.

So this appears to be a pretty slow, 2-core box:

[ 0.049778] SMP: Total of 2 processors activated (96.00 BogoMIPS).

Julien --- how does 2.5 hours for kernel build sound to you? (make -j4
all modules)


-boris




_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

  reply	other threads:[~2017-01-19 19:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-01-18 15:05 [linux-linus test] 104237: regressions - FAIL osstest service owner
2017-01-05  1:52 ` Xen 4.8 + Linux 4.9 + Credit2 = can't bootup Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2017-01-05  2:05   ` Andrew Cooper
2017-01-05  8:39     ` Dario Faggioli
2017-01-05  9:33       ` Anshul Makkar
2017-01-05  2:10   ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2017-01-05  3:13     ` Boris Ostrovsky
2017-01-06 15:55       ` Boris Ostrovsky
2017-01-12 12:50       ` Dario Faggioli
2017-01-12 16:22         ` Boris Ostrovsky
2017-01-12 16:41           ` Dario Faggioli
2017-01-12 18:27             ` Ian Jackson
2017-01-13  3:20               ` Boris Ostrovsky
2017-01-13  8:31           ` Dario Faggioli
2017-01-13 15:39             ` Boris Ostrovsky
2017-01-13 16:27               ` Ian Jackson
2017-01-13 23:13                 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2017-01-16 11:38                   ` Ian Jackson
2017-01-19 11:36                   ` Xen 4.8 + Linux 4.9 + Credit2 = can't bootup [and 1 more messages] Ian Jackson
2017-01-16 15:38                 ` Xen 4.8 + Linux 4.9 + Credit2 = can't bootup Roger Pau Monné
2017-01-16 15:39                   ` Ian Jackson
2017-01-12 18:24         ` Ian Jackson
2017-01-19 17:06 ` [linux-linus test] 104237: regressions - FAIL Boris Ostrovsky
2017-01-19 16:23   ` [linux-linus bisection] complete test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemut-win7-amd64 osstest service owner
2017-01-19 18:05     ` [linux-linus bisection] complete test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemut-win7-amd64 [and 1 more messages] Ian Jackson
2017-01-19 18:44       ` Boris Ostrovsky
2017-01-20 11:09         ` Ian Jackson
2017-01-20 16:29           ` Boris Ostrovsky
2017-01-20 16:59             ` Boris Ostrovsky
2017-01-19 18:07   ` [linux-linus test] 104237: regressions - FAIL Ian Jackson
2017-01-19 19:09     ` Boris Ostrovsky [this message]
2017-01-19 19:15       ` Boris Ostrovsky
2017-01-19 20:37         ` Julien Grall
2017-01-19 21:01           ` Boris Ostrovsky
2017-01-20 12:06           ` Ian Jackson
2017-01-23 12:16             ` Ian Jackson
2017-01-23 14:31               ` Boris Ostrovsky

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3351eb65-d6f2-0aef-eda4-9913980920c3@oracle.com \
    --to=boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com \
    --cc=ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com \
    --cc=julien.grall@arm.com \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.