From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6] eal/x86: add 128-bit atomic compare
	exchange
Date: Thu, 04 Apr 2019 14:12:53 +0200
Message-ID: <3359378.XCyAA4UgPl@xps>
References: <20190403193541.28044-1-thomas@monjalon.net>
 <d0a83891-5cc6-0dd1-fe2a-5a1644bbfee8@intel.com> <2055527.rJq3IElKPH@xps>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: Shahaf Shuler <shahafs@mellanox.com>, Matan Azrad <matan@mellanox.com>,
 Yongseok Koh <yskoh@mellanox.com>, dev@dpdk.org, olivier.matz@6wind.com,
 arybchenko@solarflare.com, bruce.richardson@intel.com,
 konstantin.ananyev@intel.com, gavin.hu@arm.com, Honnappa.Nagarahalli@arm.com,
 nd@arm.com, chaozhu@linux.vnet.ibm.com, jerinj@marvell.com,
 hemant.agrawal@nxp.com
To: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>, Gage Eads <gage.eads@intel.com>
Return-path: <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>
Received: from out5-smtp.messagingengine.com (out5-smtp.messagingengine.com
 [66.111.4.29]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49F651B11C
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Thu,  4 Apr 2019 14:12:58 +0200 (CEST)
In-Reply-To: <2055527.rJq3IElKPH@xps>
List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org
Sender: "dev" <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>

04/04/2019 14:08, Thomas Monjalon:
> 04/04/2019 13:47, Ferruh Yigit:
> > .../dpdk/x86_64-native-linuxapp-gcc/include/rte_atomic_64.h:223:3: erro=
r: ISO C
> > does not support =E2=80=98__int128=E2=80=99 types [-Werror=3Dpedantic]
>=20
> We can try this kind of workaround (disable pedantic locally):
> https://github.com/HowardHinnant/date/pull/38/commits/177032852d5b4614112=
ca1ab3ef42d6b41824816

Or better:
__extension__ typedef __int128 int128;