From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.0 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RP_MATCHES_RCVD, STOX_REPLY_TYPE shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 045311F70F for ; Wed, 25 Jan 2017 06:55:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751312AbdAYGzE (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Jan 2017 01:55:04 -0500 Received: from smtp-out-6.talktalk.net ([62.24.135.70]:50280 "EHLO smtp-out-6.talktalk.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751286AbdAYGzD (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Jan 2017 01:55:03 -0500 Received: from PhilipOakley ([92.31.218.76]) by smtp.talktalk.net with SMTP id WHT4crwrKgKstWHT4cw1X6; Wed, 25 Jan 2017 06:54:08 +0000 X-Originating-IP: [92.31.218.76] X-Spam: 0 X-OAuthority: v=2.2 cv=GdBVpkfL c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=e6L6E7eW+5Nb7SO+DvSdIg==:117 a=e6L6E7eW+5Nb7SO+DvSdIg==:17 a=8nJEP1OIZ-IA:10 a=1XWaLZrsAAAA:8 a=FtYL4oDj57Bkap42mIQA:9 a=wPNLvfGTeEIA:10 a=nJcEw6yWrPvoIXZ49MH8:22 Message-ID: <33E354BCDB9A4192B69B9B399381659E@PhilipOakley> Reply-To: "Philip Oakley" From: "Philip Oakley" To: "Stefan Beller" , Cc: , , , , , , "Stefan Beller" References: <923cd4e4-5c9c-4eaf-0fea-6deff6875b88@tngtech.com> <20170125002116.22111-1-sbeller@google.com> Subject: Re: SubmittingPatches: drop temporal reference for PGP signing Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2017 06:54:06 -0000 Organization: OPDS MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5931 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.6157 X-CMAE-Envelope: MS4wfMck1yEJR6tNkk3ND0sSeZ1LyoZTfEUpL4VEd/TuTxjZcQp8YsJgk583JGtxC5h41BfTsfCbCaFi7fkaRo/v42E5QpBgb+BYSG1QjGDXgZGtJlw5Qiwi gvI0W66b+mcH8nH+nTDH//uaLgAIkWgBXMn1fcLMSLL4BunEdInnmSSAuf3wmfEb1brT4dpMmy2rB6RCX+nkoALvbNH4krKNe8ynTGFyIkUJc//VE15YISf5 2ZfuaekeV7prMnMksNssFBZWpE2zWqWknzY4JoKph8U4wdVKQpyMoBhmkWY/2NAN0sB0P5j79t+5oW9gVuYWZ/Khr8n7pwIRjQ4Q9PLnCsm8z2TBXPLJWPK4 nzNguX0K7tIGbYyETG/kwQNcbuHy509LugKCmPsH5HjofRDLU2BQ+Ahwbv6JomR+pPeeVRNJTer066MDJOpxEkZKrl2gebQghTv819slAIFTBLM5vOY= Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org From: "Stefan Beller" >> >>> Do not PGP sign your patch, at least *for now*. (...) >> > > And maybe these 2 small words are the bug in the documentation? > Shall we drop the "at least for now" part, like so: > > ---8<--- > From 2c4fe0e67451892186ff6257b20c53e088c9ec67 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: Stefan Beller > Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2017 16:19:13 -0800 > Subject: [PATCH] SubmittingPatches: drop temporal reference for PGP > signing > > Signed-off-by: Stefan Beller > --- > Documentation/SubmittingPatches | 12 ++++++------ > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/Documentation/SubmittingPatches > b/Documentation/SubmittingPatches > index 08352deaae..28da4ad2d4 100644 > --- a/Documentation/SubmittingPatches > +++ b/Documentation/SubmittingPatches > @@ -216,12 +216,12 @@ that it will be postponed. > Exception: If your mailer is mangling patches then someone may ask > you to re-send them using MIME, that is OK. > > -Do not PGP sign your patch, at least for now. Most likely, your > -maintainer or other people on the list would not have your PGP > -key and would not bother obtaining it anyway. Your patch is not > -judged by who you are; a good patch from an unknown origin has a > -far better chance of being accepted than a patch from a known, > -respected origin that is done poorly or does incorrect things. > +Do not PGP sign your patch. Most likely, your maintainer or other > +people on the list would not have your PGP key and would not bother > +obtaining it anyway. Your patch is not judged by who you are; a good > +patch from an unknown origin has a far better chance of being accepted > +than a patch from a known, respected origin that is done poorly or > +does incorrect things. Wouldn't this also benefit from a forward reference to the section 5 on the DOC signining? This would avoid Cornelius's case where he felt that section 5 no longer applied. > If you really really really really want to do a PGP signed > patch, format it as "multipart/signed", not a text/plain message > -- > 2.11.0.495.g04f60290a0.dirty -- Philip