From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.0 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,BODY_URI_ONLY, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RP_MATCHES_RCVD shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1351D2047F for ; Tue, 25 Jul 2017 11:28:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751824AbdGYL2j convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 Jul 2017 07:28:39 -0400 Received: from mx-out.tlen.pl ([193.222.135.145]:39985 "EHLO mx-out.tlen.pl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751817AbdGYL2i (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 Jul 2017 07:28:38 -0400 Received: (wp-smtpd smtp.tlen.pl 16093 invoked from network); 25 Jul 2017 13:28:36 +0200 Received: from unknown (HELO [192.168.2.102]) (lukaszgryglicki@o2.pl@[85.222.70.18]) (envelope-sender ) by smtp.tlen.pl (WP-SMTPD) with SMTP for ; 25 Jul 2017 13:28:36 +0200 From: lukaszgryglicki Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.3 \(3273\)) Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] merge: add a --signoff flag. Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2017 13:28:36 +0200 References: <0102015d0c41db74-34ff8613-05e2-44bb-a05b-2624108c36c8-000000@eu-west-1.amazonses.com> <0102015d0cf235f7-9be8e1fc-a926-4e6f-8180-c131da1c4161-000000@eu-west-1.amazonses.com> To: git@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: Message-Id: <33E39FC8-6C5A-4323-AA0F-B65255464649@o2.pl> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3273) X-WP-MailID: fdeff32d16cf8f36ce03b0e133f6d5cd X-WP-AV: skaner antywirusowy Poczty o2 X-WP-SPAM: NO 0000000 [wfM0] Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Hi, can You take a look at my newest patch version (v3)? > On 24 Jul 2017, at 22:42, Junio C Hamano wrote: > > Junio C Hamano writes: > >> lukaszgryglicki writes: >> >>> Hi, what is the state of this patch? >> >> I was expecting you to respond to Ævar's <87tw2sbnyl.fsf@gmail.com> >> to explain how your new version addresses his concerns, or him to >> respond to your new patch to say that it addresses his concerns >> adequately. I think neither has happened, so the topic is still in >> limbo, I guess... > > Sorry, Ævar's message I meant was <87fueferd4.fsf@gmail.com>.