All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
To: Herakliusz Lipiec <herakliusz.lipiec@intel.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, anatoly.burakov@intel.com
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 0/2] ipc: fix possible memleaks
Date: Fri, 03 May 2019 10:34:16 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3401531.dNvLWj16ye@xps> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190425124817.28409-1-herakliusz.lipiec@intel.com>

25/04/2019 14:48, Herakliusz Lipiec:
> When sending multiple requests, rte_mp_request_sync
> can succeed sending a few of those requests, but then
> fail on a later one and in the end return with rc=-1.
> The upper layers - e.g. device hotplug - currently
> handles this case as if no messages were sent and no
> memory for response buffers was allocated, which is
> not true. Fixed by always initializing message buffer
> to NULL and calling free everytime rte_mp_request_sync
> is used.
> 
> v2:
> - resending as patchset to make it easier to review it.

Heraliusz, it's a total mess.
There were 8 patches in v2. Why they disappeared?
The title prefixes are often wrong, so it's harder to classify them.

Should I merge all these patches?
  ipc: fix rte_mp_request_sync memleak
  ipc: fix hotplug memleak
  ipc: fix vdev memleak
  ipc: fix vfio memleak
  ipc: fix pdump memleak
  ipc: fix tap pmd memleak
  ipc: fix net/mlx4 memleak
  ipc: fix net/mlx5 memleak




  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-05-03  8:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-04-17 14:38 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/8] ipc: fix rte_mp_request_sync memleak Herakliusz Lipiec
2019-04-23  8:11 ` Burakov, Anatoly
2019-04-23  8:13 ` Burakov, Anatoly
2019-04-23 17:43 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/8] ipc: fix possible memleaks Herakliusz Lipiec
2019-04-23 17:43   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/8] ipc: fix rte_mp_request_sync memleak Herakliusz Lipiec
2019-04-24  9:28     ` Stojaczyk, Dariusz
2019-04-25  9:37     ` Burakov, Anatoly
2019-04-23 17:43   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/8] ipc: fix hotplug memleak Herakliusz Lipiec
2019-04-25  6:00     ` Stojaczyk, Dariusz
2019-04-23 17:43   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 3/8] ipc: fix vdev memleak Herakliusz Lipiec
2019-04-25  6:08     ` Stojaczyk, Dariusz
2019-04-23 17:43   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 4/8] ipc: fix vfio memleak Herakliusz Lipiec
2019-04-25  6:06     ` Stojaczyk, Dariusz
2019-04-23 17:43   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 5/8] ipc: fix pdump memleak Herakliusz Lipiec
2019-04-23 17:43   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 6/8] ipc: fix tap pmd memleak Herakliusz Lipiec
2019-04-23 17:43   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 7/8] ipc: fix net/mlx4 memleak Herakliusz Lipiec
2019-04-23 20:16     ` Yongseok Koh
2019-04-23 17:43   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 8/8] ipc: fix net/mlx5 memleak Herakliusz Lipiec
2019-04-23 20:16     ` Yongseok Koh
2019-04-25 11:43   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 0/2] ipc: fix possible memleaks Herakliusz Lipiec
2019-04-25 11:43     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 1/2] ipc: fix rte_mp_request_sync memleak Herakliusz Lipiec
2019-04-25 12:47       ` Burakov, Anatoly
2019-04-25 11:43     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 2/2] ipc: fix tap pmd memleak Herakliusz Lipiec
2019-04-25 12:48     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 0/2] ipc: fix possible memleaks Herakliusz Lipiec
2019-04-25 12:48       ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 1/2] ipc: fix rte_mp_request_sync memleak Herakliusz Lipiec
2019-04-25 12:48         ` Burakov, Anatoly
2019-04-25 12:48       ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 2/2] ipc: fix tap pmd memleak Herakliusz Lipiec
2019-04-25 18:14         ` Wiles, Keith
2019-05-03  8:34       ` Thomas Monjalon [this message]
2019-05-03  8:38         ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 0/2] ipc: fix possible memleaks Burakov, Anatoly
2019-05-03 10:28       ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 0/2] ipc: fix possible memory leaks Herakliusz Lipiec
2019-05-03 10:28         ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 1/2] ipc: fix memory leak in sync request Herakliusz Lipiec
2019-05-03 10:28         ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 2/2] net/tap: fix ipc related memory leak Herakliusz Lipiec
2019-05-03 10:54         ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 0/2] ipc: fix possible memory leaks Thomas Monjalon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3401531.dNvLWj16ye@xps \
    --to=thomas@monjalon.net \
    --cc=anatoly.burakov@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=herakliusz.lipiec@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.