From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:57941) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gs6UZ-0006th-HG for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 08 Feb 2019 08:46:56 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gs6UX-0003Z5-L3 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 08 Feb 2019 08:46:55 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:42778) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gs6UX-0003Ra-D6 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 08 Feb 2019 08:46:53 -0500 References: <20190207142649.GL19438@redhat.com> From: Paolo Bonzini Message-ID: <3428f328-2418-d3f6-8236-0f96cf855fd9@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2019 14:46:27 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 3/3] char-socket: Lock tcp_chr_disconnect() and socket_reconnect_timeout() List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Alberto Garcia , =?UTF-8?Q?Daniel_P=2e_Berrang=c3=a9?= Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, =?UTF-8?Q?Marc-Andr=c3=a9_Lureau?= On 08/02/19 10:34, Alberto Garcia wrote: >> and also works with the vhostuser reconnect device, then we are >> probably ok. > How do I test this? QTEST_QEMU_BINARY=3Dx86_64-softmmu/qemu-system-x86_64 \ QTEST_VHOST_USER_FIXME=3D1 \ tests/vhost-user-test Paolo