From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.5 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, NICE_REPLY_A,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE467C433E0 for ; Mon, 15 Mar 2021 15:03:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from desiato.infradead.org (desiato.infradead.org [90.155.92.199]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5A4F664DDF for ; Mon, 15 Mar 2021 15:03:21 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 5A4F664DDF Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=denx.de Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=desiato.20200630; h=Sender:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post:List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:From: References:Cc:To:Subject:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=48Fr8d9CAgikSjUPaYqudPaKoRgBOUnwDUfd0wWg6VU=; b=ApdRHrq+ReiE9aDnQ2BZ7d1HV ApGVBAG2l1Rtvr0szH2mi53ESfSJxq19/kblJV24YIOcUBtSoMHYfoXd/vSNC4lZuqJYqpzGQE0nn UipZD6MEFhiEuut46N8Muk+tZTVeI6oxB4T4/u+vpMTXKDxXno02B/ApHil4SoqJQEl0oMkXNe1OP ROCmqPySWv13sTln1eDsWVzgUXz9UJKCz66BNprJUvjJW6gOrpg/BpxAbsWuDKY4twT8ZFnxmzeRb BXpoMT0fg1K+7/pAQanjfgHKNdQjP3LOXZpQfYsjeGFuHB5wxRxtrEb0/52OuIH231gqGWtT4ftq+ n1TeF5m8Q==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=desiato.infradead.org) by desiato.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1lLojD-00GEMa-5d; Mon, 15 Mar 2021 15:01:55 +0000 Received: from mail-out.m-online.net ([212.18.0.10]) by desiato.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.94 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1lLoiw-00GEJB-Qj for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Mon, 15 Mar 2021 15:01:40 +0000 Received: from frontend01.mail.m-online.net (unknown [192.168.8.182]) by mail-out.m-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4Dzfl56fk6z1ryp5; Mon, 15 Mar 2021 16:01:37 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost (dynscan1.mnet-online.de [192.168.6.70]) by mail.m-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4Dzfl55f6fz1qqkt; Mon, 15 Mar 2021 16:01:37 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mnet-online.de Received: from mail.mnet-online.de ([192.168.8.182]) by localhost (dynscan1.mail.m-online.net [192.168.6.70]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IwAKvCcciwSC; Mon, 15 Mar 2021 16:01:36 +0100 (CET) X-Auth-Info: 91DEx3Pnj304o4YXfljC7EmWM6AeTtpR7njqFuPmmrk= Received: from [127.0.0.1] (p578adb1c.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [87.138.219.28]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.mnet-online.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA; Mon, 15 Mar 2021 16:01:36 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: [Linux-stm32] [PATCH] ARM: dts: stm32: Fill GPIO line names on AV96 To: Ahmad Fatoum , Christoph Niedermaier , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , "linus.walleij@linaro.org" Cc: Maxime Coquelin , "linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com" , Alexandre Torgue , Patrick Delaunay , Patrice Chotard , Frank Rowand References: <20200724101610.146403-1-marex@denx.de> <495b2f6b-04b7-c1eb-7aed-cd55636bef46@denx.de> <4530980295044f8ab9c1cfe14e02f90f@dh-electronics.com> <6616e8b0-2b7d-a157-c24f-0493ce03c45b@denx.de> <86beeb51e9594b14ac0f449495b46736@dh-electronics.com> <7504da89-63a7-1b80-3159-a0346535137e@denx.de> <788d7d182b13448c8afc4b99518daa34@dh-electronics.com> From: Marek Vasut Message-ID: <34769f70-c7e2-984c-fd86-b82aaf38ba57@denx.de> Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2021 15:29:31 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Language: en-US X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20210315_150138_966048_14CE28AD X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 17.79 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On 3/15/21 1:05 PM, Ahmad Fatoum wrote: > On 15.03.21 12:41, Christoph Niedermaier wrote: >>> So I'll pose another question here to the GPIO maintainers. >>> >>> Is it OK to define gpio-line-names in SoM DTSI even for pins which will >>> not be used as GPIOs e.g. because they are muxed differently in the >>> carrier board DTS ? >>> >>> If that is OK, then the above approach is then also OK. >> >> In our case, we cannot mux the GPIO pins in the carrier board DTS >> to another functions, because then we break our SOM standard (DHCOM). >> So in the case we relabel a GPIO in the carrier board e.g. "DHCOM-I" >> becomes "LED1" the mux function have to be GPIO. > > For standards like SMARC, where the interface is predefined, I think it makes > much sense to have the SoM dtsi contain not only the line-names, but also > ready-to-use, pinmuxing settings. > > Base boards can then either enable peripherals with just a status = "okay" > if they follow the standard or just override it if they choose to do > stuff differently. Sadly, I think I have to remind you of the discussion around pinctrl groups we have in stm32mp15-pinctrl.dtsi and how that does not scale. This is a very similar situation here, since the SoM is rather universal. And the other thing I would like to point out here are the discussions around DT connector. What you described above is exactly that, except the implementation is still not finished. Let's CC Frank. _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel