From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/4] ethdev additions to support tunnel
	encap/decap
Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2018 18:26:35 +0200
Message-ID: <3531070.uXvx30kj13@xps>
References: <20180418210423.13847-1-declan.doherty@intel.com>
 <20180423155620.22409-1-declan.doherty@intel.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, Alex Rosenbaum <alexr@mellanox.com>,
 Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>, Shahaf Shuler <shahafs@mellanox.com>,
 Qi Zhang <qi.z.zhang@intel.com>,
 Alejandro Lucero <alejandro.lucero@netronome.com>,
 Andrew Rybchenko <arybchenko@solarflare.com>,
 Mohammad Abdul Awal <mohammad.abdul.awal@intel.com>,
 Remy Horton <remy.horton@intel.com>, John McNamara <john.mcnamara@intel.com>,
 Rony Efraim <ronye@mellanox.com>, Jingjing Wu <jingjing.wu@intel.com>,
 Wenzhuo Lu <wenzhuo.lu@intel.com>, Vincent Jardin <vincent.jardin@6wind.com>,
 Yuanhan Liu <yliu@fridaylinux.org>,
 Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>,
 Konstantin Ananyev <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>
To: Declan Doherty <declan.doherty@intel.com>
Return-path: <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>
Received: from out3-smtp.messagingengine.com (out3-smtp.messagingengine.com
 [66.111.4.27]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B4962C12
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Tue, 24 Apr 2018 18:26:40 +0200 (CEST)
In-Reply-To: <20180423155620.22409-1-declan.doherty@intel.com>
List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org
Sender: "dev" <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>

Hi,

> Declan Doherty (4):
>   ethdev: Add tunnel encap/decap actions
>   ethdev: Add group JUMP action
>   ethdev: add mark flow item to rte_flow_item_types
>   ethdev: add shared counter support to rte_flow

No specific comment.

It is only an API without any PMD implementation.
Which PMDs are planned to be supported? When?

Next time, we could require to have at least one implementation,
when submitting a new API.

The feature is described with rte_flow.
Adrien is the expert to review it, and he already said it was almost good.
Considering how we are late for RC1, the patches could be merged without
the final review/ack if lack of time.