From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Monjalon Subject: Re: [PATCH V12 1/3] eal: add uevent monitor api and callback func Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2018 02:13:55 +0100 Message-ID: <3568576.lheXnZb7QM@xps> References: <1516013331-18939-3-git-send-email-jia.guo@intel.com> <1516248723-16985-1-git-send-email-jia.guo@intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Cc: dev@dpdk.org, stephen@networkplumber.org, bruce.richardson@intel.com, ferruh.yigit@intel.com, gaetan.rivet@6wind.com, konstantin.ananyev@intel.com, jblunck@infradead.org, shreyansh.jain@nxp.com, jingjing.wu@intel.com, helin.zhang@intel.com, motih@mellanox.com To: Jeff Guo Return-path: Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com (out1-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.25]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B6A91B2E8 for ; Fri, 19 Jan 2018 02:14:30 +0100 (CET) In-Reply-To: <1516248723-16985-1-git-send-email-jia.guo@intel.com> List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" 18/01/2018 05:12, Jeff Guo: > + * It registers the callback for the specific device. > + * Multiple callbacks cal be registered at the same time. > + * > + * @param device_name > + * The device name, that is the param name of the struct rte_device, Why not using rte_device pointer? > + * null value means for all devices. I don't see any management of NULL value. On the contrary, I see + if (device_name == NULL) + return -EINVAL; > + * @param cb_fn > + * callback address. > + * @param cb_arg > + * address of parameter for callback. > + * > + * @return > + * - On success, zero. > + * - On failure, a negative value. > + */ > +int rte_dev_callback_register(char *device_name, rte_dev_event_cb_fn cb_fn, > + void *cb_arg); > +